``
MINUTES
Council Meeting
8 February 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. DECLARATION OF OPENING / ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS:
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT:
8. MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN:
27328 9.3.2 Council Financial Payments November 2017
27330 9.3.4 Monthly Financial Activity Statement - December 2017
27331 9.5.2 Request for Council Support to Modify Dams and a Section of Grays Road, Quinninup
27332 9.5.3 Proposed Overheight Outbuilding on a Vacant Lot at Lot 854 (No 8) Muir Street, Manjimup
27333 9.5.4 Change of Use from a 'Dwelling' to 'Holiday House' at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole
27334 9.5.6 Proposed Revision of Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 - Advertising of Planning Proposals
27335 9.9.2 Proposed Review of Policy 3.1.3 Community Funds Allocation
27336 9.9.3 Community Services Directorate Quarterly Report October - December 2017
27337 9.3.1 Proposed Middlesex Hall Lease and Sublease
27338 9.3.5 Budget Review Adjustments - December 2017
27339 9.5.1 Proposed Rural Worker's Accommodation at Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook
27340 9.5.5 Retrospective Application for Dam Extension at Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark
27344 9.12.1 Proposed Budget Amendment - North Walpole Road, Walpole
27345 9.13.1 Proposed Amendment to Staff Training Budget
11. MOTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE FOLLOWING MEETING
12. NEW BUSINESS OF AN URGENT NATURE INTRODUCED BY DECISION OF THE MEETING:
27349 L.1 Future Use of No 792 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup
13. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE:
Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held in the Council Chamber Manjimup, Thursday, 8 February 2018.
1. DECLARATION OF OPENING / ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS:
The Shire President declared the meeting open at 5.30pm.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT:
The Shire President made the following announcements:
· Read out a letter from Augusta Margaret River thanking us for our assistance with the recent fire in Augusta.
· Attended a meeting with Terry Redman.
· A reminder that the Queens Baton Relay is in Manjimup on 22 February, 2018.
· Manager of NBN WA in in Manjimup on 22 February, 2018.
· The Rotary Tall Timbers Wine Show is on this evening.
· Terry Redman is currently in Canberra lobbying for the Southern Forests Irrigation Scheme.
PRESENT:
Councillors
Cr P Omodei (Shire President)
Cr D Bavich
Cr L Daubney
Cr W Eiby
Cr V Herbert
Cr D Jenkins
Cr D Tapley
Cr R Taylor
Cr M Ventris
Cr C Winfield
Staff
Mr Andrew Campbell (Chief Executive Officer)
Mr Greg Lockwood (Director Business)
Ms Gail Ipsen Cutts (Director Community Services)
Mr Brian Robinson (Director Development & Regulation)
Mr Michael Leers (Director Works & Services)
Ms Gaye Burridge (Corporate Administration Officer)
Gallery
Dean Baker
Kate Baker
Lily Baker
Alexander Baker
Heather Llewellyn
Cathy Taylor
Mary Nixon
Rob Fittock
David Giblett
Nancy Giblett
Lucinda Giblett
Jason Diangelo-Buckley
Tina Diangelo-Buckley
Dianna Western
Sandy Edwards
Gordana Engeleo
Calre Bailey
Hannah Bailey
Jamie Copeland
Pippa Darrington
Anna-Lisa Macfarlane
Lucas Macfarlane
Joel Goodridge
Jake Goodridge
Mason Goodridge
Fiona Browne
Valerie Densmore
Helen Rose
Ken Gordon
Susan Craven
James Craven
Alan Lush
Marie Kelly
Evelyn Collin
Margaret Jacob
Joyce Wootton
Wade De Campo
3.1 Apologies: Nil
3.2 Leave Of Absence:
Councillor Jayde Salomone has been granted a leave absence for this meeting.
The Chief Executive Officer advised that he has received a Financial Interest declaration from Councillor Dean Bavich for Item L.1.
Councillor Bavich declared a Financial Interest in Item L.1 as he has provided a property valuation quote to determine market value before and after rezoning of the property.
5. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME:
5.1 Response to public questions taken on notice. Nil
5.2 Public Question Time
5.2.1 Rob Fittock for Statewide Investments - Item 9.6.1 - Commencement of Construction without a Building Permit - Lot 1 (No 27685) South Western Highway, Balbarrup.
· On 8 December 2017 we were advised that Building Permit hadn’t been approved as Planning Approval hadn’t been granted. However the Planning Approval had been granted 11 November 2017.
· Building work was stopped immediately when advised that Building Approval had not be granted.
Director Development and Regulation responded: The application was passed to me and looking at the application it was apparent that it was incomplete. There are certain time frames within in which an application has to be dealt with.
· The application was granted at 8.42am on 22 December 2017. The footings were cast on 21 December, 2017. Work ceased immediately they were advised that the Building Application had not been granted.
5.2.2 Lucinda Giblett – Stellar Violets Inc. – Item 9.5.7 Request for Support - Proposed Scheme Amendment over Lot 1 (No 21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex.
· We would ask Councillors to support the recommendation before Council tonight.
· This is long term project for the benefit of the community.
· Currently have a number of living museum artefacts including an electric vehicle.
· Plans to have an exhibition centre.
· Currently have an organic children’s playgroup.
· Run by volunteers.
5.2.3 Mary Nixon
· Shire Policies provide guidance to staff.
· Do the minutes record reasons for decisions by Council?
· Why is there no list of which Councillors voted for or against a recommendation?
Chief Executive Officer responded: Legislation require recording of resolutions. If there is a significant change to the officer recommendation, there must be reasons stated for that change.
Where some Councillors vote against the recommendation a list of who voted for and against the recommendations is indicated in the minutes.
5.2.4 Wade De Campo for Statewide Resources.
· Being prosecuted for 8 footings because of 42 minutes.
· There is a degrading relationship between Statewide Resources and Shire Staff.
· Look into reasons for prosecution.
· Peter Tagliaferri is known for pushing the boundaries and Rob Fittock is the mediator.
· Is it really worth prosecuting for 8 footings.
· Progress was halted as soon as they were advised to do so.
5.2.5 Dianna Western – Item 9.5.5 Retrospective Application for Dam Extension at Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark.
· Would like to thank you for your help over the last month.
· Reiterate the dam was built after our home was built.
· Want the potential dangers of the leaks from the dam resolved to protect family.
5.2.6 Jason Dangelo-Buckley - Item 9.5.5 Retrospective Application for Dam Extension at Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark.
· Thank Councillors.
· The dam was built well before we bought the property.
· Asked a dam builder for his help.
· The dam was enlarged unbeknownst to us.
· Unwittingly pumped too much water into the dam above the cored level and this created issues.
· The water above the cored line has now subsided.
· Other excess water is coming from the land which up until recently had blue gums growing on it. They would have been using about 1.5 mega litres of water.
· Would be happy to install overflow pipes in the dam wall.
6. PRESENTATIONS:
6.1 Petitions: Nil
6.2 Presentations
6.2.1 A Citizenship Ceremony was held for Mrs Kate Baker. The Shire President congratulated her on behalf of Councillors and Staff.
6.3 Deputations: Nil
6.4 Delegates’ reports: Nil
6.5 Conference reports: Nil
7. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES:
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Taylor, R
That the Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on 18 January 2018 be confirmed. CARRIED: 10/0 |
8. MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN: Nil
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
“That Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Council Officers and Committee Reports on pages 1 – 86 of the Agenda with the exception of: |
Proposed Middlesex Hall Lease and Sublease |
|
Budget Review Adjustments - December 2017 |
|
Proposed Rural Worker's Accommodation at Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook |
|
Retrospective Application for Dam Extension at Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark |
|
Request for Support - Proposed Scheme Amendment over Lot 1 (No 21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex |
|
Commencement of Construction without a Building Permit - Lot 1 (No 27685) South Western Highway, Balbarrup |
|
Request for Councillor Representation on the Southern Forest Alcohol and Other Drug Committee and Liquor Accord. |
|
Proposed Budget Amendment - North Walpole Road, Walpole |
|
Proposed Amendment to Staff Training Budget |
|
Minutes of the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee meeting held 17 January 2018 |
|
Minutes of the Manjimup Timber & Heritage Park Advisory Committee Meeting held 12 December 2017 |
CARRIED: 10/0
Items passed by En Bloc Resolution
9.3.2 Council Financial Payments November 2017
9.3.3 Proposed Licence to Occupy for Emergency Access to Parkfield Drive - Lot 8692 Double Bridges Road, Northcliffe
9.3.4 Monthly Financial Activity Statement - December 2017
9.5.2 Request for Council Support to Modify Dams and a Section of Grays Road, Quinninup
9.5.3 Proposed Overheight Outbuilding on a Vacant Lot at Lot 854 (No 8) Muir Street, Manjimup
9.5.4 Change of Use from a 'Dwelling' to 'Holiday House' at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole
9.5.6 Proposed Revision of Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 - Advertising of Planning Proposals
9.9.2 Proposed Review of Policy 3.1.3 Community Funds Allocation
9.9.3 Community Services Directorate Quarterly Report October - December 2017
9.3.2 Council Financial Payments November 2017
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
N/A |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole of Shire |
WARD: |
All |
ZONE: |
Whole of Shire |
DIRECTORATE: |
Business |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160967 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 |
AUTHOR: |
Kaylee Blee |
DATE OF REPORT: |
17/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
It is a statutory requirement for a list of payments from the Municipal and Trust Funds to be presented to Council and included in the Minutes.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The accounts for payment totalling $2,877,101.96 for the month of November 2017 are itemised in the attachment and in the Corporate Card Statement listed below.
ATTACHMENT: 9.3.2(1)
Vouchers for the expenditure are available for inspection at the Council Meeting of 8 February 2018.
Fund |
Vouchers |
Amount |
Municipal |
90609 - 90715 |
$612,742.28 |
Trust Fund |
3090 - 3103 |
$1,120.00 |
Total Cheques for Month of November 2017 |
$613,862.28 |
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) expenditure batch reports are available for inspection at the Council Meeting of 8 February 2018
Fund |
Batch |
Amount |
Municipal |
319 – 330 |
$2,256,878.39 |
Total EFT for Month of November 2018 |
$2,256,878.39 |
Corporate Credit Card November 2017 – Municipal Account
1010WA3.1.57 |
B Select Mandurah Replacement Tyre 1010WA – DD&R |
$329.00 |
|
20276.7.58 |
Card Fee |
$18.25 |
|
20148.213.52 |
The Rose Hotel Bunbury Accommodation L Wedrat – OSH Training |
$125.00 |
|
20049.197.57 |
Bridgetown Hotel Lunch – Shire of Bridgetown for Warren Blackwood Stock Route meeting |
$71.00 |
|
20026.82.58 |
Abbey Beach Resort Busselton Accommodation & Breakfast – New councillor training CR. M Ventris |
$191.00 |
|
20047.81.52 |
Boot Camp Digital Facebook training for new PRO |
$49.81 |
|
86.4999.6405.57 |
Adobe Creative Cloud CS7 Suite for PRO to design documents |
$74.76 |
|
20026.81.58 |
Comfort Hotel Perth Accommodation for Shire President – Presidents, Mayors & Deputies Day |
$126.88 |
|
20026.81.58 |
Comfort Hotel Perth Accommodation for Deputy Shire President – Presidents, Mayors & Deputies Day |
$126.88 |
|
20276.7.58 |
Card Fee |
$18.25 |
|
69.4999.7300.57 |
Liquid Files Licence upgrade 10-100 users – 1 year |
$1,068.36 |
|
20139.848.57 |
Coles Manjimup Various Groceries for seniors week |
$301.40 |
|
99999.908.99 |
Westnet Internet services 1/1/17 – 1/12/17 |
$614.94 |
|
68.4999.3240.57 |
Crabapple Lane Bed & B Nannup Accommodation ITC consultancy IT for Shire of Nannup |
$150.00 |
|
68.4999.7300.57 |
Teamviewer.com Teamviewer corporate subscription - 1 year |
$1,482.46 |
|
20276.7.58 |
Card Fee |
$18.25 |
|
20496.197.58 |
Tribe Perth Breakfast, Dinner & Parking DWS – WADE event |
$56.00 |
|
150.9502.20.50 |
DWER – Water Clearing permit – Mottram St |
$200.00 |
|
711.299.3240.57 |
Blue Tiger Café Coffee – meeting with Mainroads WA |
$12.50 |
|
20260.198.52 |
Blue Dog Training White card training – N Phungana |
$80.00 |
|
20260.198.52 |
Blue Dog Training White card training – M Tascon |
$80.00 |
|
20260.198.52 |
Centre for Pavement En Box Hill Improved pavement design training - Tascon |
$395.00 |
|
20049.197.57 |
Patricia Ann Keegan (Bello Torta) Morning tea SMT ST:5 |
$122.20 |
|
20276.7.58 |
Card Fee |
$18.25 |
|
66.4999.7300.57 |
Adobe Creative Cloud Monthly Subscription for CAO |
$52.10 |
|
20049.197.57 |
Patricia Ann Keegan (Bello Torta) Morning tea SMT ST:6 |
$120.40 |
|
66.4999.3240.57 |
Tall Timbers Manjimup 3 meals – Places & Faces Comp WA photo |
$96.00 |
|
66.4999.3240.57 |
Manjimup Liquor World Refreshments – Places & Faces opening night |
$75.97 |
|
66.4999.3240.57 |
Woolworths Grocery Items – Places & Faces opening night |
$70.17 |
|
20219.198.52 |
City Kebab Perth DCS meal – National hazard management workshop |
$11.00 |
|
20219.198.52 |
City of Perth Parking Parking DCS – National hazard management workshop |
$5.14 |
|
20219.198.52 |
CPP His Majestys Perth Parking DCS – National hazard management workshop |
$24.70 |
|
20468.198.52 |
Blue Dog Training WA Construction White Card – E Apeldoorn |
$80.00 |
|
20049.197.57 |
Coles Manjimup Staff Nibbles |
$13.20 |
|
85.4220.7328.57 85.4220.2044.57 |
WEX (Coles) Groceries & items for café Lil – MRAC |
$64.17 |
|
20276.7.58 |
Card Fee |
$18.25 |
|
Total Credit Card Payments |
$6,361.29 |
||
Total Payments for the month October 2017 |
$2,877,101.96 |
||
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, Regulations (12) and (13)
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
As Stated
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council receive the accounts paid during November 2017 totalling $2,877,101.96 as detailed in Corporate Card Statement and Attachment: 9.3.1(1).
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council receive the accounts paid during November 2017 totalling $2,877,101.96 as detailed in Corporate Card Statement and Attachment: 9.3.1(1). ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
13
9.3.3 Proposed Licence to Occupy for Emergency Access to Parkfield Drive - Lot 8692 Double Bridges Road, Northcliffe
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Mr G Doust |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 8692 Double Bridges Road, Meerup |
WARD: |
Coastal |
ZONE: |
Rural Small Holdings |
DIRECTORATE: |
Business |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F180061 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Jasmine Bamess; Todd Ridley |
DATE OF REPORT: |
22 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
There are 21 properties in the estate serviced by Parkfield Drive, Northcliffe. A risk assessment of the subdivision has identified there is only one exit route from Parkfield Drive direct to Windy Harbour Road, and therefore an identified need for a second emergency access route. It is proposed to resolve this by an agreement with the land owner of adjoining Lot 8692 to establish an ‘emergency access way’ from the southern end of Parkfield Drive through to Double Bridges Road.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
There is currently a shale constructed harvest road part way through Lot 8692 from Double Bridges Road. It is proposed the Shire will maintain this and construct an extension to the southern end of Parkfield Drive where a fire service access gate will be installed. Directional and restricted access signage will also be installed.
The proposed arrangement is a Licence to Occupy. This will give the Shire the non-exclusive right to maintain the access way and have it available for public use in the event of an emergency. It does not give the Shire an interest in the land.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Nil
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The emergency access way will be included in any fire response plans and local emergency management arrangements.
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
The Shire will be responsible for the initial construction and ongoing maintenance of the access way from Parkfield Drive through to Double Bridges Road. The Shire will patrol the area for unauthorised use.
Initial construction is budgeted for with a $30,000 allocation carried forward since the 2014/15 budget. Ongoing maintenance at $500.00 per year will be covered as part of fire mitigation expenses within the current annual budget.
There will be no fees payable to the landowner; they will benefit from having the Shire maintain their driveway and firebreaks.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Provision of a secondary emergency access route for properties on Parkfield Drive.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council enter a Licence to Occupy with the landowner for portion of Lot 8692 Double Bridges Road, Meerup for the purpose of an emergency access way from Parkfield Drive to Double Bridges Road, for a term of ten years, with a renewal option of a further ten year term, at a rental of ten dollars payable on demand.
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council enter a Licence to Occupy with the landowner for portion of Lot 8692 Double Bridges Road, Meerup for the purpose of an emergency access way from Parkfield Drive to Double Bridges Road, for a term of ten years, with a renewal option of a further ten year term, at a rental of ten dollars payable on demand. ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
16
9.3.4 Monthly Financial Activity Statement - December 2017
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Whole Shire |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole Shire |
WARD: |
Whole Shire |
ZONE: |
N/A |
DIRECTORATE: |
Business |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160188 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995; Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 |
AUTHOR: |
Greg Lockwood |
DATE OF REPORT: |
25/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The Financial Management Regulations require monthly Financial Activity Statement reports to be prepared and presented to Council, containing the following information;
ü Annual budget estimates;
ü Estimates to end of month;
ü Actual expenditure;
ü Actual income;
ü Material variances; and
ü Net current assets.
The Financial Activity Statement report for the period to 31 December 2017 is attached. The report is summarised by Function/Activity with operating comments via department.
ATTACHMENT: 9.3.4 (1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The financial performance for the Shire of Manjimup to the 31 December 2017 is a projected deficit $10,886.
The $10,886 deficit is a projection based on a conservative approach highlighting possible issues as they occur, which in most cases can be rectified or offset with under/over expenditure in other areas as the Shire progress through the financial year.
In brief, the projected figures in most cases, assumes that the expenditure to 31 December 2017 continue at the same rate to 30 June 2018. Where an asterisks appears in the “Adj” column in the Management Reports, the formula has been changed to reflect the irregular purchase, or seasonal nature of that particular account. It should be noted that where a projected under expenditure might occur, the budgeted figure is still maintained.
As part of the mid-year review all accounts were assessed against budget. This review did not show any adverse trends or variances that were of concern. There are minor over and under expenditures but it is expected that these will offset each other at year end 30 June 2018.
The December 17 Monthly Activity Statement serves as a review of the year to date. This issues listed below are significant items from previous reports that have seen some sort of budget adjustment or monitoring so as not to affect the end of financial year position. They are:
Financial Assistance Grants – Overall reduction of $163,396
In August 2017 Shire Officers were made aware of a significant reduction in Financial Assistance Grants due to Grants Commission modelling for Western Australian Population Growth not meeting targets.
General Purpose Grant |
2017/18 Allocation |
2017/18 Adopted Budget |
(Shortfall) / Excess |
2017/2018 GP Grant Allocation |
2,694,289 |
2,875,357 |
(181,068) |
Total General Purpose Grant |
2,694,289 |
2,875,357 |
(181,068) |
Road Grant |
|||
2017/2018 Road Grant Allocation |
1,345,622 |
1,327,950 |
17,672 |
Total Local Roads Grant |
1,345,622 |
1,327,950 |
17,672 |
The general Mainstreet Upgrade project was adjusted to reflect this grant reduction.
Royalties for Regions funding reduction of $3,000,000
Post-election the incoming Government reviewed all Royalties for Regions Projects with a view to consolidate revenue to help fund election promises. The negotiated reduction was tied to Town Centre Revitalisation Stage 2 project, so savings and adjustments were made within the components. This reduction is not expected to affect the overall outcome and intent of the project.
State Direct Grant reduction of $135,390
The State Government reduced the 2017/18 State Direct Grant in an effort to improve the State’s budget position. This adjustment was made after a failed attempt to remove the exemptions of Stamp Duty and Licencing on light vehicles and plant. Had the exemption removal gone ahead it would only have cost the Shire of Manjimup approximately $90,000 rather than the $135,390 taken away from the State Direct Grant.
The State Direct Grant funds road maintenance so as part of the September budget adjustments Road Maintenance was reduced by the $135,390. Due to this significant reduction Road Maintenance accounts are being watched closely
Road Maintenance while not excessively high compared to previous years the Works Directorate will need to keep control of the account over the coming months leaving sufficient budget for the last quarter of the financial year where Works employees will move from Infrastructure to maintenance works.
There have been no major issues arise in the 6 months of 2017/18 and with sound financial management going forward by all departments, Council should be in a neutral or minor surplus position at the 30 June 2018.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Section 6.8 Local Government Act and Financial Management Regulation 34.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
As described in above summary.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council receive the Monthly Financial Activity Statement Report for December 2017 as per ATTACHMENT: 9.3.4(1).
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council receive the Monthly Financial Activity Statement Report for December 2017 as per ATTACHMENT: 9.3.4(1).
ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
20
9.5.2 Request for Council Support to Modify Dams and a Section of Grays Road, Quinninup
PROPONENT |
Ryan Family Farms |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Part Grays Road Reserve 2130066, Lot 1 Grays Road, Quinninup |
WARD: |
East |
ZONE: |
Road Reserve, Priority Agriculture |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F180001, P56236, P56237 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005; Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4, Land Administration Act 1997 |
AUTHOR: |
Jason Giadresco |
DATE OF REPORT: |
22 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council is requested to consider a proposal to modify part of Grays Road, Quinninup. A copy of the correspondence provided by the proponent is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.2(1)
Location Plan
The proponent is seeking Council’s support to modify a 200m section of Grays Road, Quinninup. Currently, this section of Grays Road is relatively narrow and partially inundated with water from the proponent’s dams on the northern and southern sides. The proponent wishes to increase the capacity of both dams to ensure a greater level of water security for the horticultural operations undertaken on adjoining properties. An aerial image showing the indicative changes to the road reserve is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.2(2)
The purpose of the proposed modification of the road, as described by the proponent is to:
· Raise this section of unsealed Grays Road to a minimum height of approximately 2.3m above the existing road level to facilitate the construction of dam banks on both the northern and southern sides of the road reserve.
· Raise the road height to remove the ponded water from the existing dams out of Council’s road reserve.
· Straighten the road and widen the corner on the south side to improve vehicle passability. No modification of the existing common property boundaries is proposed. All works will take place within the road reserve, and at the applicants cost.
The purpose of this report is to consider support for the proposed road modification. Should this be granted, further statutory processes will be required to allow for the proposal to be implemented. Should Council determine to support the proposal it will in effect provide “in-principle” support to the concept.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil at this time.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
Land Status
The landowner’s property at Lot 1 Grays Road is zoned Priority Agriculture by Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 (the Scheme). The Grays Road reserve is administered and maintained by the Shire, and is reserved by the Scheme as ‘Local Roads’.
Currently two of the proponent’s dams on Lot 1 are connected under the subject section of Grays Road via two concrete pipes of unspecified size. The water level of the existing dams is less than 1m in height from the top of the existing road surface. No culvert exists between the ponded water and road shoulder. The proponent notes that the current height of the road is a result of works undertaken by the Shire in 1996.
By way of further background, Council in 2014 granted the proponent approval to realign a section of Grays Road and construct a 1.9 km long, 200m wide dam, with a capacity of 1.5 gigalitres. The vast majority of the road works pertinent to that application have been completed, but the approved dam is yet to be constructed. This proposal is linked to the previous approval as the dam walls on this section need to be raised to accommodate the additional capacity of the dam.
Design Considerations
The overall intent of the proposal is to remove the water ponded within Council’s road reserve, improve the safety of the road through the widening of the corner and provide additional height to the dam walls to accommodate the additional water capacity generated by the dam approved in 2014.
The construction of the proposed dam walls will partially be contained within the road reserve. The trafficable area of the road will be constructed on top of the raised dam walls. Specific details of the wall construction have not yet been determined, including heights, batter and material to be used and reconstruction of the section of road. The road itself will have a gravel seal.
Shire Officers are supportive of the proposal, as it provides opportunity to remove ponded water from inside Council’s road reserve, and reconstruct the affected section of road to a safer standard for the travelling public.
Shire Officers recommend to Council that to ensure that the dam walls and road are constructed to a standard that will ensure water is retained outside of the road reserve and the road can be traversed in a safe manner, a suitably qualified structural engineer is engaged by the proponent to produce a design that is acceptable to Council. Advice to this effect is contained in the Officer Recommendation below.
Request for In-Kind Support
The proponent has advised that they will assume responsibility for the majority cost and completion of the works, but have requested that Council contribute to the reconstruction of the subject section of Grays Road, on the basis the proponent’s family have made significant contribution to the maintenance and upgrading of Grays Road in previous years. It is however unclear as to what the proponents expectations of Council are at this point.
Given that the Shire stands to substantially benefit from the proposal, and the works will be undertaken at considerably expense of the proponent, Shire officers recommend that Council:
· Waive all of Statutory Planning Application Fees that will need to be paid to facilitate obtaining the necessary approvals for the execution of the proposal; and
· Consider contributing to the cost of reconstructing Grays Road.
Through inspection of the road, the Manager of Technical Services has identified that the existing concrete pipes passing under the road are aged, and in the opinion of the Manager of Technical Services, not of suitable size to dispose of water between the dams due to proposed its increased capacity. The Manager of Technical Services has recommended consideration be given to the shire installing new pipes under the road at a cost of approximately $10,000. The sizing of the concrete pipes would be determined in the detailed design of the walls and road by the proponent’s engineer, and subject to Shire approval.
Council will need to further consider a potential financial contribution as part of the 2018/19 annual budget process once a detailed cost exercise has been completed.
Statutory Requirements
Should Council resolve to support the proposal to modify the 200m long section of Grays Road, the proponent will have to make application, accompanied by appropriate detailed plans devised by a suitably qualified engineer, for development approval to undertake the works within the road reserve. Further approval from the Shire’s Technical Services Department may be required for the proponent to enter the road reserve to undertake the works required
Council is to note that support for the proposal outlined above does not constitute approval for the works. This will be subject to further assessment and consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, and final approval issued by Council at a later date. Advice to this effect will be included in the Officer Recommendation below.
Conclusion
Shire staff recommend that Council support this proposal. The proposal provides Council opportunity to improve its road infrastructure on Grays Road, whilst the proponent can improve the water security of the farming operations on the property.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
In the event Council provides ‘in-principle’ support, the proponent will be required to obtain the necessary statutory and agency approvals. Shire staff will assist in facilitating this process as is necessary.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Planning and Development Act 2005 and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4.
The proposal is considered to be consistent with the purpose and objectives of the Priority Agriculture Zone in ensuring the preservation of existing agricultural production, and supports the improvement of resource and investment security for agricultural and allied industry production. The proposal also improves road safety and increases the protection of Shire infrastructure. Straightening the section of the road will reduce the Shire’s maintenance costs on Grays Road.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
If supported, Council will waive its statutory fee charges connected with this development. Additionally, further consideration towards the road reconstruction will need to be considered as part of the 2018/19 annual budget process.
Sustainability:
Environmental: The proposal greatly contributes toward the sustainable use of high quality agricultural land, by preserving existing agricultural production and allowing for new agricultural production by securing a suitable water resource. Minimal removal of vegetation in the current Grays Road reserve is required.
Economic: The proposal will support the improvement of resource and investment security for the proponent’s agricultural activities. The expansion of the water resource available will provide for increased agricultural production, providing for greater local employment.
Social: The improvement of Grays Road will reconfigure a problematic section and make use of the road safer.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
1. Advise the proponent it prepared to grant ‘in-principle’ support to the modification of part Grays Road Reserve 2130066 for the purposes of dam construction on Lot 1 Grays Road subject to:
a) Application for dam construction being made to Council, supported by a detailed design of the proposed road modifications and dam walls prepared by a suitably qualified engineer; and
b) A detailed breakdown of the total cost of the proposal being prepared to the satisfaction of the Manager of Technical Services.
2. Waives all Council statutory fee charges associated with the proposal.
3. Advises the applicant that it is prepared to consider contributing to the proposed reconstruction of Grays Road as part of the 2018/19 and requests that the applicant clarify their expectations as to the Shires contribution towards the project.
4. Await a further report on the matter, subject to the matters above being addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer.
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council: 1. Advise the proponent it prepared to grant ‘in-principle’ support to the modification of part Grays Road Reserve 2130066 for the purposes of dam construction on Lot 1 Grays Road subject to: a) Application for dam construction being made to Council, supported by a detailed design of the proposed road modifications and dam walls prepared by a suitably qualified engineer; and b) A detailed breakdown of the total cost of the proposal being prepared to the satisfaction of the Manager of Technical Services. 2. Waives all Council statutory fee charges associated with the proposal. 3. Advises the applicant that it is prepared to consider contributing to the proposed reconstruction of Grays Road as part of the 2018/19 and requests that the applicant clarify their expectations as to the Shires contribution towards the project. 4. Await a further report on the matter, subject to the matters above being addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer.
ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
26
9.5.3 Proposed Overheight Outbuilding on a Vacant Lot at Lot 854 (No 8) Muir Street, Manjimup
PROPONENT |
Mr AB & Mrs DC Johnson |
OWNER |
Mr AB & Mrs DC Johnson |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 854 (8) Muir Street, Manjimup |
WARD: |
Central |
ZONE: |
Residential R20 |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
DA17/263; P51774 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005 |
AUTHOR: |
Kaylene Roberts |
DATE OF REPORT: |
15/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council is asked to consider a development application for an over height outbuilding on vacant Lot 854 (8) Muir Street, Manjimup. Location, site and development plans are attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.3(1)
Location Plan
The land, having an area of 2,226m² is currently vacant, with road access available from Muir Street. The property previously had Council approval for a Grouped Dwelling in 2014, but has since expired and is no longer valid.
Approval is sought to a 20m by 9m (180m²) outbuilding with a wall height of 3.75m and a ridge height of 4.62m. Supporting correspondence states that the outbuilding is be built to accommodate a caravan and general-purpose use and is to be the first stage of development. The applicant has also supplied a plan of the future dwelling to be constructed on the property (refer attached).
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.3(2)
The application is referred to Council for determination as Shire staff do not have delegated authority to determine applications for outbuildings on vacant lots within residential zones due to the Scheme’s presumption against this form of development.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
The application was advertised in accordance with clause 9.6 of the Scheme for a 14 day period to all adjoining landowners. Council records indicate that the letters were sent from the Shire office on 2 January 2018 with submissions closing on 16 January 2018.
One submission was received and will be discussed in the comment section of this report. A copy of the submission is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.3(3)
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The provisions of the Shire of Manjimup’s Local Planning Scheme No. 4 (the Scheme) include the land within the Residential Zone. The application has been assessed against clause 5.12.8 Outbuildings of the Scheme and LPS4 6.1.3 Domestic Outbuildings (the Policy).
The proposed shed structure constitutes a domestic outbuilding which is defined by the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia as:
“An enclosed non-habitable structure that is detached from any dwelling.”
Outbuildings within Residential zones are required to comply with the requirements prescribed by both the Scheme and Policy. To guide Council on the determination of this application, the following comments are offered:
Compliance with Scheme clause 5.12.8 (ii)
Point (ii) of clause 5.12.8 states that “…approval will not be granted for any outbuildings in any Town site or on Rural Residential and Rural Smallholdings zoned lot that does not contain a residence, unless otherwise approved by the local government.” Given that the property is currently vacant, Council’s prior approval is required.
Shire staff contacted the applicant regarding whether the application is to be a staged development. The applicant has supplied a draft of the future residence which is to be constructed early in 2018.
Further guidance on the potential to approve an outbuilding on a vacant lot is provided within Local Planning Policy 6.1.3 as detailed below.
Compliance with Policy
The proposed outbuilding complies with the development standards identified within the policy except for the specified maximum wall and ridge heights. The Policy provides for wall heights to be 3m and ridge heights of 4.2m in this zoning. The proposed outbuilding has a wall height of 3.75m and ridge height of 4.62m.
In respect of these height variations, the applicant has stated that they intend to house a caravan in the proposed outbuilding and will require the additional height for clearance. The height variations are considered minor and the author of this report is satisfied that the development will not detrimentally impact on the amenity of the adjacent properties, as the outbuilding will be setback in accordance with setbacks required under the Residential Design Codes of WA.
With respect to Outbuildings being constructed on vacant land, the Policy stipulates that neighbouring property owners must be consulted to identify any concerns regarding the proposal. The policy advocates approval of such proposals where “no objections on material grounds have been received from the affected neighbouring property owners”. As stated within the Public Consultation section, the neighbouring property owners have been consulted and one submission has been received.
Submission
The correspondence received advises that submitters are satisfied with the proposal provided it is used for the storage of a boat and caravan only. The submitters raised concern that the proposed outbuilding could be used as an “industrial shed” and it would be an inconvenience to the occupier of the dwelling on their property. They have stated that as long as the owner/Shire can guarantee that in the future the outbuilding will only be used for storage then they agree but if can’t be guaranteed then their answer is no.
It is recommended that the adjacent landowners concerns be addressed through a condition of approval specifying that the proposed outbuilding is to be used solely for purposes incidental to the future residence on the land. The imposition of this condition will ensure that the outbuilding is to be used for domestic purposes only, the adjoining landowners concerns are addressed, and will ensure compliance with the Scheme’s zoning requirements.
Conclusion
Provided that the future use of the proposed outbuilding is restricted to domestic purposes only, the adjacent landowners concerns will be addressed. Given this, approval to the application would be consistent with the Policy and conditional approval is recommended.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Planning and Development Act 2005 and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No. 4.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Compliance with Local Planning Policy LPS4 6.1.3 Domestic Outbuildings as discussed above.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
The development application fee has been paid by the applicant.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: Nil.
Social: The concerns of the adjoining landowner are considered to be addressed by the imposition of appropriate conditions of approval protecting the amenity of adjoining properties.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No. 4 grants development approval for the proposed over height outbuilding on a vacant lot at Lot 854 (8) Muir Street, Manjimup (Application TP248/2017) in accordance with the plans submitted attached at 9.5.3(1) and subject to the following conditions and advice:
a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent of the Shire of Manjimup.
b) The approved Shed/Outbuilding is not to be used for Commercial, Human Habitation or any purpose other than as a domestic outbuilding, unless the further approval from the SHIRE OF MANJIMUP is obtained.
c) The proposed development shall be clad or coloured to complement either the surroundings in which it is located or adjoining developments to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup but the use of reflective materials and colours is not permitted.
d) The approved outbuilding is to be used solely for purposes incidental and ancillary to the enjoyment of the future residence as the approved use of the property and not to be used for commercial purposes.
1. Advice to Applicant:
a) The proponent is advised that this development approval is NOT a building permit. A building permit must be formally applied for and obtained from Building Services BEFORE the commencement of any site and/or development works; and
b) The applicant is advised that the resultant development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Building Code of Australia, the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1911.
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No. 4 grants development approval for the proposed over height outbuilding on a vacant lot at Lot 854 (8) Muir Street, Manjimup (Application TP248/2017) in accordance with the plans submitted attached at 9.5.3(1) and subject to the following conditions and advice: a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent of the Shire of Manjimup. b) The approved Shed/Outbuilding is not to be used for Commercial, Human Habitation or any purpose other than as a domestic outbuilding, unless the further approval from the SHIRE OF MANJIMUP is obtained. c) The proposed development shall be clad or coloured to complement either the surroundings in which it is located or adjoining developments to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup but the use of reflective materials and colours is not permitted. d) The approved outbuilding is to be used solely for purposes incidental and ancillary to the enjoyment of the future residence as the approved use of the property and not to be used for commercial purposes. 1. Advice to Applicant: a) The proponent is advised that this development approval is NOT a building permit. A building permit must be formally applied for and obtained from Building Services BEFORE the commencement of any site and/or development works; and b) The applicant is advised that the resultant development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Building Code of Australia, the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1911.
ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
31
9.5.4 Change of Use from a 'Dwelling' to 'Holiday House' at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole
PROPONENT |
Mr R C Williams |
OWNER |
Mr R C Williams |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole |
WARD: |
South |
ZONE: |
Residential R10 |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
DA17/267; P54527 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005 |
AUTHOR: |
Kaylene Roberts |
DATE OF REPORT: |
15/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council is asked to consider a development application for a change of use from a ‘Dwelling’ to a ‘Holiday House’ at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole. The site and management details are attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.4(1)
Location Plan
Lot 99 (40) has an area of 1,286m² and currently contains a dwelling, outbuilding and a patio. The application is proposing the use of the existing dwelling for the purposes of a Holiday House. The proposal will utilise the existing facilities available on the property with no new construction proposed.
The key elements of the proposal are:
· The application is proposing the number of guests to be a maximum of six (6) persons;
· The management of the property will be undertaken by the landowner;
· The cleaning will be undertaken by professional cleaners;
· No signage is proposed for the Holiday House application;
· The implementation of the Emergency Evacuation Response Plan as submitted;
· Parking is available for 4 cars, undercover and a paved area; and
· Bookings for the Holiday House will be through the Air BNB website.
The application is referred to Council for determination as a Holiday House in a Residential zone constitutes an ‘A’ land use which requires Council approval after advertising in accordance with clause 9.6 of the Scheme.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
The application was advertised in accordance with clause 9.6 of the Scheme for a 16 day period to all adjoining landowners. Council records indicate that letters were sent from the Shire office on 2 January 2018 with submissions closing 18 January 2018. A sign was placed on the subject property.
One submission was received and will be discussed in the comment section of this report. A copy of the submission is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.4(2)
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The provisions of the Local Planning Scheme No. 4 (the Scheme) include the subject land within the Residential Zone. A Holiday House is an ‘A’ use within the Residential Zone. That is a use which is not permitted unless approval is sought and granted by Council following the advertising of the proposal.
To guide Council in its determination of the application the following comments are offered:
Land Use
The proposed use is consistent with the Scheme definition of a Holiday House, being a dwelling together with its associated outbuildings that are:
· designed primarily as a dwelling house for permanent residential purposes whether or not occupied periodically as such; and
· used, whether or not for commercial gain or reward, from time to time for unsupervised, short-stay tourist accommodation purposes excluding people that are members of the owner’s family but including all people where the owner is a company.
As described in the proponent’s management plan, the application is for short term accommodation to be operated on a commercial basis, and is to be operated by the current owners. The application proposes that a maximum of 6 persons will use the Holiday House at any one time.
Consistency with Zoning
The objectives of the Residential Zone as outlined in clause 4.3.2 of the Scheme are designed to manage and conserve the amenity of residential locales and provide for adequate supply of residential land. Non-residential activities are to create self-employment and not have a detrimental impact on the amenity.
The proposed Holiday House will provide the owner with a source of income and provided that the behaviour of future occupants is appropriately managed, the proposed Holiday House is not expected to have any impact upon the amenity of the surrounding area or environmental attributes of the area.
Compliance with the Holiday Houses Policy
Details supplied in support of the application confirm the proposed use will be managed as follows:
· The proponent will manage the property and will be responsible for the maintenance of the holiday house, whilst professional cleaners have been engaged to undertake day to day cleaning of the Holiday House;
· The proponent has stated that all bookings will be made through the website Air BnB and that the key collection is to be arranged;
· The proponent has advised that the maximum number of guests will be six (6) persons. As the proponent has not stated whether these six persons will be known to each other, it is recommended that a condition be imposed requiring all occupants of the Holiday House to be known to each other, ensuring compliance with the Scheme;
· There is sufficient car parking spaces for four (4) cars within the carport and a paved area. Sufficient parking is therefore available within the site. It is however recommended that a condition requiring on-site parking for at least 2 car parking spaces to service the Holiday House be included on any approval granted by Council to reinforce this requirement;
· The proponent has supplied an Emergency Evacuation Response Plan showing the evacuation points as well as the assembly area and a plan will also be displayed showing where the fire extinguishers and fire blankets are located;
· Signage has not been proposed for the Holiday House by this application, any signage beyond what is allowed by the Scheme will require the further approval of the Shire of Manjimup. This will be conditioned on any approval granted by Council; and
· The applicant currently have not stated whether they have Public Liability Insurance. It is recommended an appropriate condition be imposed on any approval granted by Council.
The above arrangements will ensure that operation of the proposed Holiday House will comply with the requirements of Local Planning Policy and Scheme requirements.
Building Code
In accordance with the Building Code of Australia, the proposed Holiday House will require a change of classification prior to commencement of the use. It is proposed that an advice note be included on any approval granted.
Health Act
The proposed use will be required to operate in compliance with all relevant requirements of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2016. It is recommended that an advice note be included on any approval granted by Council to reflect this requirement.
Guest Register
The applicant is required to maintain a guest register of all guests and this is to be made available to the Shire of Manjimup on request.
Submission
The submission provided by the Landowner at No 3 (Lot 102) Howe Court objects to the proposal on the following grounds:
· The submitter purchased property in 2012 to retire in Walpole due to the amenity it provided. The amenity of the area will be disturbed by the proposal;
· Believes that the Boronia Ridge Estate should be residential only. Suitable accommodation options are available in the Walpole area;
· Approval of the proposal will take business away from existing accommodation providers within the area;
· Believes that the proposal will detrimentally impact the area through occupant noise, particularly in the evening hours and increased traffic to and from the property; and
· Restates their objection to the proposal and that they chose to live in this area for the peace and quiet.
In general terms the potential for a Holiday House to impact on the residential amenity of an area is limited to:
· Behaviour (including noise) of the occupants; and
· Ad-hoc parking associated with activity.
In this case, the property contains a substantial driveway and hardstand areas to contain parking. Provided that all parking is contained on site, the only potential for impact would be through the behaviour of the occupants. It is recommended that appropriate conditions be imposed to ensure that the facility is appropriately managed and any inappropriate behaviour dealt with.
It should be there are currently other Holiday Houses within the Boronia Ridge Estate and the Shire have had no objections or complaints regarding these activities.
Common Boundary with Shire Reserve
As reflected on the location plan, the subject land shares a common boundary with Crown Reserve 44332, being vested with the Shire for the purposes of “Public Recreation.” During inspection of the property is was noted that the common boundary with the reserve is not fenced and there is potential for inappropriate use of the reserve to occur (i.e. parking).
In order to ensure that inappropriate use of the reserve does not occur, it is recommended that conditions be imposed to require all activities associated with the Holiday House to be contained on site and demarcation of the common boundary.
Conclusion
As detailed above, the Holiday House at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole generally conforms to the provisions of the Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No. 4 and is compliant with Local Planning Policy 6.1.5 – Holiday Houses. The concerns raised by the adjacent landowner can be conditionally addressed by Council to ensure the amenity of the area is preserved.
Given the above, it is recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions ensuring compliance with the Policy.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Planning and Development Act 2005 and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No. 4.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The application has been assessed in accordance with the provisions of Local Planning Policy 6.1.5 – Holiday Houses.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
The required Development Application Fee has been paid by the applicant.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: The proposal if approved by Council will allow the proponent to increase business activity on the property and potentially increase the economic return of the property.
Social: The concerns outlined in the adjoining landowners objection can conditionally addressed, and the amenity of the area preserved.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grants planning approval for a Change of Use from a Dwelling to a Holiday House at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole in accordance with the submitted plans as attached at 9.5.4(1), and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to the commencement of the approved use, the applicant is to supply a copy of their Public Liability Insurance to the Shire of Manjimup;
2. The Holiday House hereby approved is limited to a maximum of six (6) persons who are known to each other in the premises at any one time to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup;
3. The Holiday House is not to be occupied by a person for more than three (3) months within any twelve (12) month period. In this regard, the manager/operator is to maintain a register of guests and the duration of their occupation to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup on demand;
4. The submitted management details form part of the application and shall be implemented on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup;
5. Prior to the commencement of the approved use, the boundary adjoining the Shire reserve is to be demarked to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer and from thereon maintained;
6. All activities relating to the Holiday House are to be contained within the subject property;
7. Two (2) car parking spaces are to be provided on site for the use of users of the Holiday House at all times;
8. The Emergency Evacuation Response Plan, including provision of the Manager’s contact details, is to be displayed in the Holiday House at all times; and
9. Any proposed signage for the Holiday House beyond the requirements of the Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 will require the further approval of the Shire of Manjimup.
Advises the applicant that:
1. In all buildings approved for use as a Holiday House, a system of emergency lighting will need to be installed to assist in evacuation of occupants in the event of fire and this lighting will need to:-
a) be activated by a smoke alarm(s); and
b) consist of:
· lights incorporated into the smoke alarm itself; and
· lighting incorporated in the corridor, hallway or area served by the required smoke alarm(s).
2. The approved development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2016 and the Building Act 2016.
3. A Building Permit is required to be obtained from Building Services for the reclassification of the Dwelling to a Holiday House.
4. Further to condition 5 above, the applicant is encouraged to erect a boundary fence on the common boundary with Crown Reserve 44332.
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grants planning approval for a Change of Use from a Dwelling to a Holiday House at Lot 99 (40) Karri Street, Walpole in accordance with the submitted plans as attached at 9.5.4(1), and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the commencement of the approved use, the applicant is to supply a copy of their Public Liability Insurance to the Shire of Manjimup; 2. The Holiday House hereby approved is limited to a maximum of six (6) persons who are known to each other in the premises at any one time to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup; 3. The Holiday House is not to be occupied by a person for more than three (3) months within any twelve (12) month period. In this regard, the manager/operator is to maintain a register of guests and the duration of their occupation to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup on demand; 4. The submitted management details form part of the application and shall be implemented on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup; 5. Prior to the commencement of the approved use, the boundary adjoining the Shire reserve is to be demarked to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer and from thereon maintained; 6. All activities relating to the Holiday House are to be contained within the subject property; 7. Two (2) car parking spaces are to be provided on site for the use of users of the Holiday House at all times; 8. The Emergency Evacuation Response Plan, including provision of the Manager’s contact details, is to be displayed in the Holiday House at all times; and 9. Any proposed signage for the Holiday House beyond the requirements of the Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 will require the further approval of the Shire of Manjimup. Advises the applicant that: 1. In all buildings approved for use as a Holiday House, a system of emergency lighting will need to be installed to assist in evacuation of occupants in the event of fire and this lighting will need to:- a) be activated by a smoke alarm(s); and b) consist of: · lights incorporated into the smoke alarm itself; and · lighting incorporated in the corridor, hallway or area served by the required smoke alarm(s). 2. The approved development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2016 and the Building Act 2016. 3. A Building Permit is required to be obtained from Building Services for the reclassification of the Dwelling to a Holiday House. 4. Further to condition 5 above, the applicant is encouraged to erect a boundary fence on the common boundary with Crown Reserve 44332. ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
39
APPENDIX
9.5.6 Proposed Revision of Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 - Advertising of Planning Proposals
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
N/A |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole of Shire |
WARD: |
All Wards |
ZONE: |
All Zones |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development & Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F161518 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005 |
AUTHOR: |
Brian Robinson |
DATE OF REPORT: |
22/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The provisions of Local Planning Scheme No 4 require that certain developments land use proposals are advertised for public comment prior to the application being determined. Other forms of planning proposals such as Structure Plans and amendments to the Local Planning Scheme must also be advertised for public comment.
The extent of advertising to be undertaken is guided by the provisions of Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 (LPP 6.1.2), which was adopted in December 2016. The adopted Policy reflected past practices of the Shire. A copy of LPP 6.1.2 as adopted by Council is shown at Appendix: 9.5.6 (1).
APPENDIX: 9.5.6(1)
In respect of land use proposals, LPP 6.1.2 contains two tables that prescribe how the level of advertising is to be determined and what that advertising is to consist of. Examples of the current policy provisions are further detailed within the comment section of this agenda item.
The Policy also stipulates that all advertising occurs over a 14 day period. As elected members are aware, Shire employees have verbally been requested to allow additional time for comment periods to allow for Australia Post Delivery times, particularly in the area of Walpole.
Council is requested to consider reviewing the current Policy approach to simplify the assessment criteria, ensure a consistent approach to advertising and extend the advertising period to 21 days. A copy of the revised draft policy is shown attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.6(1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Should Council support a review of LPP No 6.1.2, the provisions of Local Planning Scheme No 4 require that the revised Local Planning Policy is advertised for public comment. Further information regarding this is provided within the Statutory Environment section of this agenda item.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
To assist Council in determining this matter, the following comments are offered:
Land Use(s)
In accordance with the Planning and Development Act 2005 and associated regulations, the provisions of Local Planning Scheme No 4 (LPS No 4) identify four land use classifications, being:
‘P’ means that the use is permitted by the Scheme providing the use complies with the relevant development standards and the requirements of the Scheme;
‘D’ means that the use is not permitted unless the local government has exercised its discretion by granting planning approval;
‘A’ means that the use is not permitted unless the local government has exercised its discretion by granting planning approval after giving special notice in accordance with Clause 9.6; and
‘X’ means a use that is not permitted by the Scheme.
Where a proposed use is identified as an “A” use, or it is a ‘use not listed’, the application must be advertised. In accordance with clause 9.6.3 of LPS No 4, the advertising may be undertaken in one or more of the following ways:
(i) Notice served on adjoining and nearby neighbours;
(ii) Publishing in a local paper;
(iii) A sign or signs on the land.
The provisions of LPP No 6.1.2 guide the extent to which adjoining and nearby neighbours are required to be notified.
Advertising of Other Applications
As stated by clause 9.6.2 of LPS No 4, Council may also choose to advertise any other application.
The provisions of LPP No 6.1.2 outline those additional circumstances where public comment will be sought. Generally speaking the policy advocates proposals seeking a relaxation of standards must also be advertised.
Heritage Proposals/Structure Plans/Scheme Amendments
LPP No 6.1.2 also stipulates advertising requirements for the above types of proposals. It should be noted however that the provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the associated “Deemed to Apply” regulations provide the statutory requirements for advertising of these types of proposals.
As the “Deemed to Apply” provisions override the provisions of both the Local Planning Scheme and Local Planning Policy, the extent of discretion is therefore limited to:
i) the length of the advertising period, which is to be not less than 14 days and not more than 28 days; and
ii) the identification of “owners and occupiers who, in the opinion of the local government, are likely to be affected by the approval”.
The current provisions of the Policy therefore require review.
Advertising Period
The provisions of LPS No 4 stipulate that where advertising is required, a minimum advertising period of 14 days shall apply. This timeframe has however proven problematic at times. Given the time it takes to forward proposals to landowners through Australia Post, the person being requested to comment often has substantially less time than 14 days in which to return their comments to the Shire.
In order to ensure all parties have an appropriate time to comment, it is recommended that a minimum 21 day period be adopted.
Referral to Ward Councillors
Often people who are requested to comment on a proposal will wish to speak to their Ward Councillor regarding the proposal. It is therefore recommended that Ward Councillors be formally advised of applications being advertised within their ward.
Consistency
To ensure consistency of in the form of advertising, it is recommended that all land uses that require advertising in accordance with LPS No 4 be advertised for a period of 21 days in the following matter:
· Erection of a Sign on Site;
· Correspondence to relevant government agencies;
· Letters to adjacent and nearby neighbours;
· Advertisement in the Local Paper;
· Listing on the Shire website; and
· Advice to the Ward Councillor.
Extent of Written Consultation
As detailed above, often the only discretion available to the Shire in respect of the advertisement of land use proposals is the extent to which it is believed that a landowner will be impacted by a proposal.
The current policy stipulates that abutting landowners include those lots that physically abut and are directly opposite the land subject of the proposal. Where a proposal relates to a minor relaxation of the scheme requirements (i.e setbacks), the consultation is limited to the abutting landowners only.
For larger proposals where LPS No 4 stipulates advertising is required, the area of consultation is widened to:
· 250m radius of the centre of the proposal site in urban areas; or
· 500m radius of the centre of the proposal site in rural or rural residential areas; or
· 1000m radius of the centre of the proposal site for proposed Industry – Extractive.
These distances appear to be somewhat arbitrary in that the same radius would be used for a Cattle Feedlot as for a Cottage Industry.
As an alternative it is recommended that the Environmental Protection Authority document “Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors” be used to identify the extent of advertising to landowners within the district. The EPA Guidelines, which have been in place since June 2005, identify specific separation distances between Industrial and Sensitive land uses in order to minimise the potential for land use impact and conflict. For example, a minimum buffer of 300-500 metres is recommended for a sand pit, versus 1,000 metres for a gravel pit.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
In accordance with LPS No 4 – clause 2.2, a Local Planning Policy in respect of any matter related to the planning and development of the Scheme area so as to apply:
(i) Generally or for a particular class or classes or matters; and
(ii) Throughout the Scheme area or in one or more parts of the Scheme area, and may amend or add to or rescind the Policy.
As prescribed by Part 2.4 of LPS No 4, a Local Planning Policy must be advertised for public comment over a period of not less than 14 days.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Modification of Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 is recommended to simplify the policy and extend the minimum advertising period to 21 days, to address concerns over the impact of Australia Postal delivery times on the length of time available to comment.
Should support the officer recommendation, the draft policy will be advertised for public comment.
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
Nil
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
a) adopt draft Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 as shown at Attachment: 9.5.6(1) for the purposes of advertising in accordance with Part 2 of Local Planning Scheme No 4.
b) Await a further report on the draft policy following the close of advertising.
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council: a) adopt draft Local Planning Policy No 6.1.2 as shown at Attachment: 9.5.6(1) for the purposes of advertising in accordance with Part 2 of Local Planning Scheme No 4. b) Await a further report on the draft policy following the close of advertising.
ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
44
APPENDIX
9.9.2 Proposed Review of Policy 3.1.3 Community Funds Allocation
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole of Shire |
WARD: |
Whole of Shire |
ZONE: |
N.A. |
DIRECTORATE: |
Community Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160252 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Evy Apeldoorn |
DATE OF REPORT: |
22 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The Shire of Manjimup Community Funds Allocation Policy 3.1.3 was adopted on 7 May 2015 and is due for review in May 2018.
At the time of its initial adoption in 2011, the policy formalised Council’s position in regard to the annual allocation of funds to support the activity of community groups. The policy objectives are to provide guidance to Council, officers and the community for a consistent and transparent program of funds allocation across the three community categories of general groups, youth and events. A copy of the existing policy is appended.
APPENDIX: 9.9.2(1)
The policy has been reviewed and amended to provide greater consistency and clarity. The amended policy is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.9.2(1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
No public consultation was undertaken; however, in carrying out this review note was made of various queries and responses in applications for funds in the previous round (2017/18) which reflected a number of unclear or ambiguous guidelines. The amended policy addresses these points.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
Under this policy Council will endeavour to allocate 2% of the prior year’s rates revenue to the Community Fund Program. While this amount may, over time, reflect growth or decline in Council rate base, the number of applications for funds and the total sum of funds applied for is growing steadily. In the 2017/18 round, 61 submissions were received totalling $231,000, with only $165,600 of funds being available. These circumstances require a robust set of conditions and criteria framing a clear and transparent funding program so that Council, officers and community applicants can all participate or fulfil their respective roles in the program with confidence.
After review, the following amendments have been made to the existing policy:
· Due to a growing number of community groups requesting financial assistance for operational costs, such as insurance, venue lease and maintenance costs, a separate category for such requests has been added;
· The Youth Grants category has been amended to provide greater clarity about the purpose of these grants, i.e. to support a youth group in each town and a chaplaincy program. Submissions for other youth projects have been referred to the General Grants category;
· As more requests are being received in recent years to support groups to celebrate anniversaries, a clause dealing with significant anniversaries has been added to Category 3C. New & Emerging Events;
· The wording for Events support has been changed into Events sponsorship, to allow any benefit package associated with the sponsorship to be made available to the Shire organisation;
· The period to acquit the granted moneys has been shortened from ‘within six months after the end of the financial year in which the grant is made’ to ‘six months after the completion of the project/event’. This is to increase accountability, and to ensure groups submit their acquittal for last year’s project/event prior to this year’s project/event start; and
· The Policy has been updated where it referred to the Incorporations Act 1987, which has been superseded by the Incorporations Act 2015.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act (1995) s6.7
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Application of this policy supports various community groups, projects and events to carry out their own activities. These activities, however, also serve to support Council in fulfilling the objectives of various Council Plans and Strategies including: Shire of Manjimup Strategic Community Plan 2017 – 2027, Access and Inclusion Plan 2013 – 2018, Arts & Culture Strategic Plan 2013 – 2023, Youth Strategic Plan 2013 – 2023, Age Friendly Communities Plan 2016 – 2021, and the Sport & Recreation Strategic Plan 2014 – 2024.
Organisational risk management:
This policy guides the appropriate administration and funds allocation of the Community Funds Program. The policy provides guidelines for officers in the correct administration of the program, for applicants in their selection of the appropriate funding category to apply for funds within and for Council in their allocation of funds. The intent of this policy is to provide clarity, consistency and transparency to the community and the applicants as well as to officers and Council so as to manage and minimise organisational risk.
Financial Implications:
Application of this policy requires Council to endeavour to allocate 2% of the prior year’s rate revenue to the Community Funds Program annually.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: This policy guides the allocation of Council funds to a variety of community groups, projects and events which in turn supports opportunity for those recipients to improve their economic sustainability.
Social: In supporting the economic sustainability of various community groups, projects and events, this policy provides for enhanced social opportunity across the Shire and across a wide variety of themes and activities.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council adopt amended Policy 3.1.3 Community Funds Allocation as per Attachment: 9.9.2(1).
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council adopt amended Policy 3.1.3 Community Funds Allocation as per Attachment: 9.9.2(1). ADOPTED BY EN BLOC RESOLUTION: 10/0 |
47
9.9.3 Community Services Directorate Quarterly Report October - December 2017
PROPONENT |
Director Community Services |
OWNER |
Whole of Shire |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole of Shire |
WARD: |
Whole of Shire |
ZONE: |
N/A |
DIRECTORATE: |
Community Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160956 |
LEGISLATION: |
Nil |
AUTHOR: |
Gail Ipsen Cutts |
DATE OF REPORT: |
29/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
A report outlining activities for the October - December 2017 quarter for the Community Services Directorate is attached for Councillors information.
ATTACHMENT: 9.9.3(1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The purpose of the report is to inform Councillors of activities and provide an opportunity to respond to any queries arising on those activities
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Nil
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
Nil
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Community services directorate facilities, programmes and services have a significant role in developing the lifestyle and wellness opportunities throughout the Shire and as such contribute to the attractiveness of the shire to live, play and invest in.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
That Council receive the Community Services Directorate Quarterly Report October - December 2017 as contained in the Attachment: 9.9.3(1)
49
9.3.1 Proposed Middlesex Hall Lease and Sublease
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup / Middlesex Social Club |
OWNER |
Messers B & B Pessotto / The Middlesex Social Club Inc |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Part Lot 250 Middlesex Rd, Middlesex |
WARD: |
East |
ZONE: |
Priority Agriculture |
DIRECTORATE: |
Business |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F180045 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Jasmine Bamess |
DATE OF REPORT: |
17 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The Middlesex Hall was relocated to its current site on Lot 250 (formerly Lot 9394) Middlesex Road, Middlesex in the 1950’s. It was intended by the landowner and local government at the time to excise the portion containing hall and tennis courts and vest it in the Manjimup Road Board.
In 1957 the then Town Planning Board approved a survey to excise the land including the hall and tennis courts, but for unknown reasons this did not proceed. A Shire memorandum from 1997 identifies that the excision was never acted upon.
Negotiation between the current landowners, B & B Pessotto, the Middlesex Social Club and the Shire of Manjimup culminated in the landowners generously entering into a deed to gift that portion of land containing the hall and tennis courts adjoining Austin Road to the Middlesex Social Club, rectifying the oversight in the formalisation of land tenure in the 1950’s.
From February 2014 the landowners have leased the gift land to the Club to allow them to occupy the land while the subdivision was to be finalised. The subdivision was delayed due to a Western Power condition, which has recently been cleared. The application for new titles and the land transfer is now being finalised, anticipated to be completed by the time the lease is due to expire 25 February 2018. The new lot will be identified as Lot 11 Austin Road, Middlesex.
This agenda item is for proposed lease arrangements for the Middlesex Hall building (being a Shire of Manjimup asset), once the land transfer is finalised.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
Now that the land tenure is being finalised, the arrangements for the building tenure are able to be formalised. Two options have been discussed with Middlesex Social Club for the Middlesex Hall building with the following considerations:
Option 1: Shire of Manjimup retains ownership of the building and leases it to the Club.
· Shire to lease portion of the land from the Club to recognise the existing location of the building.
· Shire to sublease the land and building to the Club in accordance with Council’s leasing policy, including the maintenance responsibilities schedule and standard lease agreement for community groups.
· The Club would continue to use and hire out the building for community purposes as they do now.
· Shire to be responsible for structural maintenance and building insurance.
· Club to obtain Shire approval for any alterations to the building.
· If the Club wish to apply for grant funding relating to the building the Shire would be identified as the owner and this may not meet the criteria for some grants.
Option 2: Shire of Manjimup gifts the building to Middlesex Social Club
· The Club would assume full ownership and responsibility for the building, taking on some financial risk.
· The Club would be able to apply for grant funding as the owner of the building.
The Club have advised that their preferred option is for the Shire to retain ownership of the building and have agreed to a lease and sublease arrangement.
The lease from the Club to the Shire will be on a vacant land only basis, allowing the Shire building to be on land that is not owned by the Shire. The Shire will then sublease the building to the Club in accordance with standard lease arrangements for community groups. The lease will be for the footprint of the building only, the Club will have full ownership of the tennis courts and other infrastructure on the land.
In accordance with the Deed for gifting the land the club is responsible for obtaining approval from the current landowners for the lease arrangements on the land.
The Club have requested that outstanding building maintenance items are completed prior to the lease and sublease being executed. Shire staff will be attending to this.
The Club have requested that the Shire continue to be responsible for the building insurance and this request is supported.
The Club also requested that the Shire be responsible for termite control, however this request is not supported as the maintenance responsibilities schedule of Council’s Property Leasing Policy identifies this as the responsibility of the Lessee. The policy aims to provide consistency with all community groups leasing buildings from the Shire.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995 deals with the requirements for leasing Council land; however Section 30(b) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996 exempts from these requirements leases to charitable, benevolent, educational, recreational, sporting or other like bodies, provided the members are not entitled to receive any pecuniary profit. The sublease to Middlesex Social Club Inc complies with this exemption.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The sublease will be in accordance with Council’s Property Leasing Policy 4.2.8.
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
Ongoing maintenance and other expenses for the Middlesex Hall building will be in accordance with the maintenance responsibilities schedule of Property Leasing Policy 4.2.8 and Council’s annual budget.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: The Middlesex Hall is a community facility.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council, subject to the subdivision and land transfer being finalised and approval from the current landowners, approve:
1. Lease of portion of Lot 11 Austin Road from The Middlesex Social Club Inc to the Shire of Manjimup on a vacant land only basis for a term of five years with a renewal option of a further five year term, at a rental of ten dollars per annum payable on demand; and
2. Sublease of portion of Lot 11 Austin Road, including the Middlesex Hall building, from the Shire of Manjimup to The Middlesex Social Club Inc for a term of five years with a renewal option of a further five year term, at a rental of ten dollars per annum payable on demand, with the Shire to be responsible for building insurance and maintenance responsibilities to be in accordance with Property Leasing Policy 4.2.8.
Moved: Winfield, C Seconded: Daubney, L
That Council, subject to the subdivision and land transfer being finalised and approval from the current landowners, approve: 1. Lease of portion of Lot 11 Austin Road from The Middlesex Social Club Inc to the Shire of Manjimup on a vacant land only basis for a term of five years with a renewal option of a further five year term, at a rental of ten dollars per annum payable on demand; and 2. Sublease of portion of Lot 11 Austin Road, including the Middlesex Hall building, from the Shire of Manjimup to The Middlesex Social Club Inc for a term of five years with a renewal option of a further five year term, at a rental of ten dollars per annum payable on demand, with the Shire to be responsible for building insurance and maintenance responsibilities to be in accordance with Property Leasing Policy 4.2.8. MOTION carried 7/3
|
9.3.5 Budget Review Adjustments - December 2017
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Whole Shire |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Whole Shire |
WARD: |
Whole Shire |
ZONE: |
N/A |
DIRECTORATE: |
Business |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160191 |
LEGISLATION: |
Section 6.8 Local Government Act 19995 |
AUTHOR: |
Greg Lockwood |
DATE OF REPORT: |
25/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Following a review of the Monthly accounts to 31 December 2017 a budget adjustment sheet has been prepared to reflect variations to expenditure and revenue compared to that contemplated in the 2017/2018 Annual Budget.
ATTACHMENT: 9.3.5 (1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The September 2017 Monthly Financial Statement Report has been completed and is the subject of a separate agenda item providing a full explanation of “actual” compared to “budget” for the three months of operation to 30 September 2017.
Adjustments required to the 2017/2018 adopted budget, already approved by Council by way of specific agenda items, are:
o Department of Regional Development $3,000,000 – Recognise reduction in grant for Manjimup Town Centre Revitalisation Stage 2;
o National Library of Australia Grant $4,500 – Recognise grant to undertake Preservation Needs Assessment on energy collection;
o Campground Firewood Sales $1,800 – New budget line for sale of firewood to campers at Windy Harbour;
o South West Catchment Council $7,000 – Recognise grant to carry out Victorian Tea Tree Eradication at Windy Harbour;
o Good Things Foundation $1,500 – Recognise grant to run the “Be Connected” program;
o Loverock Road Vegetation Clearing $25,000 – Reallocation of funding from the Northcliffe Mainstreet Project to clear vegetation around bridges on Loverock Road;
o Wellness & Respite Community Centre $100,000 – Allocation of Home & Community Care Reserve funding to the Wellness & Respite Community Centre;
o Walpole Playground Replacement $39,000 – Reallocation of funding to replace the Walpole Playground; and
o Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Playground Renewal $13,500 – Allocation of Playground Repair Reserve funding to the Timber Park to repaint the playground.
Other adjustments required but not yet considered by Council are:
o Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries $3,000 – Recognise successful grant application to train staff to run Senior Tai Chi classes; and
o Heritage Council WA $64,000 – Recognise grant approved in 2016/17 but not carried forward into the 2017/18 budget. Both funds and expenditure expected to be completed in 2017/18.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Section 6.8 (1) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires that expenditure not be incurred for an additional purpose unless authorised by Council.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
Details of the recommended budget adjustments are attached.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council adopts the December 2017 budget adjustments as contained in Attachment: 9.3.5(1).
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Eiby, W
That Council adopts the December 2017 budget adjustments as contained in Attachment: 9.3.5(1). CARRIED: 10/0 |
9.5.1 Proposed Rural Worker's Accommodation at Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook
PROPONENT |
SE Delroy |
OWNER |
Cuba 79 Pty Ltd |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook |
WARD: |
West |
ZONE: |
Priority Agriculture |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
DA17/255, P57315 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning & Development Act 2005; Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4. |
AUTHOR: |
Jason Giadresco |
DATE: |
16 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council is asked to consider an application for development approval for Rural Workers’ Accommodation catering for up to 25 people at Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook. The proposal’s development and management plans are attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.1(1)
Location Plan
Lot 101 is a 95.3ha property accessed from Roche Road, being an unsealed local rural road. The property contains two dams located on the southern boundary, and is utilised for horticultural production. Existing development on the property consists of two dwellings, an office and a large farm shed that are located towards the centre of the property.
Approval is being sought to four self-contained transportable buildings, catering for a total of 16 workers. Each building will contain 4 bedrooms. Plans submitted in support of the application detail that if approved, the transportables will be located between the existing office and dwelling toward the centre of the property.
In addition it is proposed to use the existing the two dwellings to cater for 9 workers, inclusive of an on-site caretaker for the property. One dwelling (marked as House A in the attached plans) will be used to provide communal kitchen and laundry facilities, in addition to the office which will also be used as a communal kitchen and dining area. The caretaker will reside in House B.
As detailed in the applicants supporting correspondence, they consider the proposed development a way of providing appropriate accommodation for seasonal workers employed by the landowner.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
The application was advertised in accordance with clause 9.6 of the Scheme to all adjoining neighbours and the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). Two submissions were received. One submission was received from DBCA, who offered no objection to the proposal.
Correspondence was also received from an adjoining landowner at Lot 102 Roche Road. A summary of the adjacent landowner’s submission is shown at Attachment: 9.5.1(2), whilst full copies of both submissions are shown at Attachment: 9.5.1(3).
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.1(2) & (3)
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The provisions of Local Planning Scheme No 4 (LPS No 4) include the subject land within the Priority Agriculture Zone. Rural Workers’ Accommodation is an ‘A’ land use within the zone, being a use that may only be approved at the discretion of Council after advertising.
Development and use of land within the Priority Agriculture Zone is regulated by the provisions of Part 5.34 of LPS No 4. To guide Council’s determination of the application the following comments are offered:
Additional Dwellings
Through examination of this application, it has been identified that the LPS No 4 provisions relating to the Priority Agriculture Zone contain ambiguous statements in respect of accommodation development. Clause 5.34.2.6 (iv) of the Scheme states that regardless of other provisions in the Scheme, the local government will not support 3 or more dwellings on any title/lot regardless of the dwelling type. The clause includes reference to Rural Worker’s Accommodation as a dwelling type.
It is however noted that the LPS No 4 definition for Rural Workers Accommodation defines the accommodation as “a building located on a rural landholding which is used for short stay, sleeping quarters for seasonal, temporary or migratory workers working on that landholding and is to be incidental to the agricultural use of that land.” Given the facilities are not self- contained and the fact that LPS No 4 defines Rural Workers Accommodation as a form of short stay accommodation, the use cannot be considered or classified as a “Dwelling”, which as defined by the Scheme is a building designed and constructed for permanent habitation.
Given the above, it appears that reference to Rural Workers Accommodation as a form of dwelling in clause 5.34.2.6 (iv) has been made in error.
Rural Workers Accommodation
Clause 5.34.2.7 of the Scheme states that where on a lot which has been developed for agricultural purposes, rural worker’s accommodation is permitted provided it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the local government that a demand exists.
The local government may approve proposals for such accommodation on the basis that it will be used for short-stay purposes by those workers. It is the opinion of the author that the application meets the requirements of this Scheme clause. In the event Council grants development approval, a condition requiring the accommodation to only be used for short stay workers is recommended to ensure ongoing compliance with the Scheme.
Local Planning Policy 6.1.10 Relocated Buildings
The proposed four transportable accommodation units are second-hand and have been assessed against Local Planning Policy 6.1.10 (the Policy). Whilst generally compliant, the relevant considerations are:
3.2 Amenity and Appearance of Proposal
The proposed accommodation is to be located 400m from Roche Road.
With regard to the adjoining landowner’s at Lot 102 submission, the location of the proposal is located some distance from the adjoining landowners dwelling, but have advised Council that their amenity is disturbed on occasion by some of the activities of the current occupants of the houses on the subject land. The provision of a caretaker responsible for the maintenance of the property and behaviour of the short-stay occupants will be included as a condition on any approval issued by Council.
3.5 Energy Efficiency
A relocated building is considered a new building under the Building Regulations 1989, or subsequent legislation. Consequently, it is required to meet the current Energy Efficiency requirements for the applicable Climate Zone as outlined in the Building Code of Australia (BCA) for the relevant class of building. Assessment of compliance with the BCA will occur at the building permit stage. It is recommended an appropriate advice note be included on any approval granted by Council.
Access to Accommodation
Access to the accommodation is to be from the unsealed 1.1 km long Roche Road which is used for dwelling access by one other property on the same road. Shire Officers undertook an inspection of Roche Road on 23 January 2018 determining that:
· In its current condition, Roche Road is slightly corrugated but relatively good for this time of year;
· Roche Road is largely a 4m wide gravel road with large vegetation in close proximity to the vehicular running surface;
· The first 400m of Roche Road is narrow at approximately 4m in width and not wide enough for two vehicles to pass comfortably. Large Karri Trees are also located close to the trafficable surface;
· The section from 400m – 700m widens out to approximately 5m in width, with minimal vegetation.
· The final section of Roche Road to the property crossover (700m -1100m) is narrow with large Karri Trees on the road edge. Two vehicles could not pass each other comfortably.
· There are a number of large open drains that prohibit vehicles from pulling too far off the verge in sections; and
· Some corners on Roche Road presented a problem with over grown vegetation that will need pruning.
As stated within the submission received, the adjoining landowner as expressed concerns that the current state of Roche Road will not be able to support the volume of traffic resulting from the proposal.
It should however be noted that the applicants currently employ more than 25 seasonal works on the site. These seasonal workers are currently travelling to and from the site on a daily basis. Should Council resolve to approve the application, it is anticipated that there will less need for the seasonal workers to use Roche Road, thereby reducing the current traffic volumes on Roche Road.
Given that approval to the proposal is likely to reduce the volume of traffic using Roche Road, a condition requiring upgrading of, or contribution towards the maintenance of Roche Road is not recommended. It is however recommended that it be recognised that the road is provided in an ‘as-is’ condition. An advice note to this effect will be included on any approval granted by Council.
Health and Building Requirements
The proposed development will need to meet the requirements of the Health Act 1911 and Building Codes of Australia 2012 to be considered compliant. An appropriate effluent disposal system is required to be installed on site for the proposed development. These aspects will be dealt with at the building permit and Environmental Health approvals stage. An advice note in regard to these aspects will be included on any approval granted by Council.
Water Supply
Although the proposed transportables are not classified as dwelling, there will be a need for the landowner to ensure a suitable source of potable water available to service the development.
Adjoining Landowner Submission
Whilst not objecting to the proposal, the landowner of Lot 102 have lodged a submission stating they have serious concerns regarding the use of Roche Road by workers engaged on the property and the behaviour of the workers on site. The landowner at Lot 102 is concerned about the preservation of their amenity.
As discussed above, it is likely that the proposal will in fact reduce the volume of traffic using Roche Road, given that workers will be residing on site. The behaviour of those workers resident on the property, and the preservation of the local amenity will be the responsibility of the caretaker of the development. Shire officers have recommended conditions that the amenity of the area be preserved are outlined in the Officer recommendation below.
Conclusion
After the consideration of the proposal and the submissions received, all issues raised are considered to have been suitably addressed by the conditions and advice recommended on approval by Council as discussed above.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Planning and Development Act 2005 and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4.
The application is considered to be consistent with the purpose and objectives of the Priority Agriculture Zone in ensuring the preservation of existing agricultural production, and supports the improvement of resource and investment security for agricultural and allied industry production.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
Nil. The appropriate application fee has been paid by the proponent.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: The application if approved, will allow the agricultural activity on the lot to operate in a more efficient manner.
Social: The adjoining landowners concerns can be conditionally addressed.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of the Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grants approval to the proposed Rural Workers Accommodation on Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook in accordance with the submitted plans attached at 9.5.1(1) and subject to the following conditions:
a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent of local government;
b) Prior to commencement of the use hereby approved, the applicant shall submit plans demonstrating provision for an on-site keeper or manager;
c) where there is one or Rural Workers on-site, a caretaker or manager shall—
(i) reside continuously in the caretaker’s dwelling; and
(ii) not be absent from the lodging house for more than 48 consecutive hours unless he or she arranges for a reputable person to have the care and management of the Rural Workers Accommodation;
d) The management details which form part of the submitted application shall be implemented on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the local government;
e) Further detail in which the proponent acknowledges responsibility for the behaviour of the workers on the premises is to be submitted to and approved by local government and the management measures so approved shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the local government;
f) An Emergency Evacuation Response Plan is to be prepared and displayed in the Rural Workers Accommodation at all times;
g) The rural workers residing on the subject property, are to be employed in rural activities taking place on that property only;
h) An on-site potable water supply shall be provided on the site and connected to the development prior to occupation of the buildings and shall thereafter be permanently maintained to the satisfaction of the local government; and
i) The Rural Workers Accommodation hereby approved is limited to no more than twenty-five (25) people to be accommodated at any one time to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup.
Advises the proponent that:
a) The current level of construction of Roche Road is provided in an “as is” considered appropriate to support the proposal and no upgrade of the road will take place to cater for the proposed development.
a) The approved development is to comply with the requirements of the “Health (Treatment of Sewage and Disposal of Effluent and Liquid Waste) Regulations, 1974” prior to occupation of the approved development; and
b) That the approved development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2016 and the Building Code of Australia, 2012.
c) The proposed operation is required to comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations, 1997.
d) The premises, which have been deemed by Environmental Health Services to constitute a ‘Lodging House’, are to be used and operated in compliance with the Shire of Manjimup Health Local Laws, 1998.
e) The proponent is required to obtain a Lodging House Permit from Environmental Health Services before any operation of the approved use is permitted to commence. This permit attracts an annual fee and depending on the type of facility proposed - and may be issued once the premises have been inspected and approved.
f) Firebreaks and low fuel zones are to be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the local government around all boundaries and buildings on the subject property, in accordance with the requirements of the Annual Shire Firebreak Notice endorsed by local government.
Moved: Ventris, M Seconded: Herbert, V
That Council in accordance with Part 10 of the Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grants approval to the proposed Rural Workers Accommodation on Lot 101 (140) Roche Road, Eastbrook in accordance with the submitted plans attached at 9.5.1(1) and subject to the following conditions: a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent of local government; b) Prior to commencement of the use hereby approved, the applicant shall submit plans demonstrating provision for an on-site keeper or manager; c) where there is one or Rural Workers on-site, a caretaker or manager shall— (i) reside continuously in the caretaker’s dwelling; and (ii) not be absent from the lodging house for more than 48 consecutive hours unless he or she arranges for a reputable person to have the care and management of the Rural Workers Accommodation; d) The management details which form part of the submitted application shall be implemented on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the local government; e) Further detail in which the proponent acknowledges responsibility for the behaviour of the workers on the premises is to be submitted to and approved by local government and the management measures so approved shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the local government; f) An Emergency Evacuation Response Plan is to be prepared and displayed in the Rural Workers Accommodation at all times; g) Rural workers residing on the property, are to be employed in rural activities undertaken by the landowner; h) An on-site potable water supply shall be provided on the site and connected to the development prior to occupation of the buildings and shall thereafter be permanently maintained to the satisfaction of the local government; and i) The Rural Workers Accommodation hereby approved is limited to no more than twenty-five (25) people to be accommodated at any one time to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup. Advises the proponent that: a) The current level of construction of Roche Road is provided in an “as is” considered appropriate to support the proposal and no upgrade of the road will take place to cater for the proposed development. a) The approved development is to comply with the requirements of the “Health (Treatment of Sewage and Disposal of Effluent and Liquid Waste) Regulations, 1974” prior to occupation of the approved development; and b) That the approved development must comply with all relevant provisions of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2016 and the Building Code of Australia, 2012. c) The proposed operation is required to comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations, 1997. d) The premises, which have been deemed by Environmental Health Services to constitute a ‘Lodging House’, are to be used and operated in compliance with the Shire of Manjimup Health Local Laws, 1998. e) The proponent is required to obtain a Lodging House Permit from Environmental Health Services before any operation of the approved use is permitted to commence. This permit attracts an annual fee and depending on the type of facility proposed - and may be issued once the premises have been inspected and approved. f) Firebreaks and low fuel zones are to be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the local government around all boundaries and buildings on the subject property, in accordance with the requirements of the Annual Shire Firebreak Notice endorsed by local government. CARRIED: 10/0 |
64
9.5.5 Retrospective Application for Dam Extension at Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark
PROPONENT |
JP & I Diangelo-Buckley |
OWNER |
JP & I Diangelo-Buckley |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Location 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark |
WARD: |
North |
ZONE: |
General Agriculture |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
DA17/244, P55610 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005; Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 |
AUTHOR: |
Jason Giadresco |
DATE OF REPORT: |
3 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
This item was deferred at the Ordinary Meeting held on 18 January 2018. The following report is a reproduction of the item considered at the previous meeting and has not been altered. The proponent was advised of the deferral and has not to date provided any new information.
Background:
Council is requested to consider a retrospective development application to reduce the normal 20m setback for a dam constructed at Location 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark.
Location Plan
Location 2066 is 16.2ha in area and located 2km north of the Manjimup townsite boundary. The property contains a Shed, approved in 2016 and an off-catchment dam constructed in the early 2000’s. The property also previously supported a Tasmanian Blue Gum plantation (Eucalyptus globulus) that has recently been harvested, and the landowners are currently remediating the site.
In early 2017, the landowners engaged the services of a local earthmoving contractor to core the northern section of the existing dam. The earth and clay extracted during the coring works was placed on the existing eastern and western dam walls, extending to within 20m of the Shire’s unconstructed Rana Road reserve. Part of this road reserve serves as a driveway for the landowner at Location 12612 Kimber Road to the south of the dam.
These unauthorised works effectively raised the height of these dam walls as to be the same height (4.5m) as the southern dam wall. The southern wall of the dam, closest to the boundary, was not disturbed or increased in height.
The unauthorised development was brought to the attention of Shire Officers by the landowner at Location 12612, who identified that the dam was leaking, with water passing through the Rana Road reserve and inundating their property. Investigation of the site by Shire Officers determined that works were within 20m of the southern property boundary, and therefore required development approval. The applicant was contacted, and submitted a retrospective application for Council to consider approval of the works undertaken.
A copy of the development plans provided by the applicant are attached for Council’s consideration.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.5(1)
Given the nature of the application is retrospective, the application cannot be considered under delegated authority. Council is therefore requested to determine the application.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
The retrospective application was advertised for a period of 14 days to the adjoining landowner at Location 12612 Kimber Road and the Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER) in accordance with clause 9.6 of the Scheme and the Policy. A submission was received from the landowners at Lot 12612, and will be considered in the Comment section below. A Schedule of Submissions (attached) has been prepared to address the issues raised by both submissions.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.5(2)
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 (the Scheme) exempts from planning approval all dams that are located a minimum of 20m from any property boundary on land zoned Priority Agriculture and General Agriculture.
In this case, the spoil from the coring of the dam has been placed on the eastern and western dam walls less than 20m from the southern boundary and requires retrospective development approval to be granted. Clause 8.6 of the Scheme provides a mechanism for approving development retrospectively. It is recommended Council use this mechanism to assess the application and grant retrospective approval if satisfied that approval of the reduced setback continues to comply with the objectives of the Scheme and will not detrimentally affect adjoining land, including the road reserve.
Council has adopted a 20m standard setback for dams as a default position. The Scheme and supporting Policy does not automatically prohibit a dam from being located closer than 20m to a property boundary. Rather, it is intended that development approval be sought and granted only where it is considered the reduced setback will not impact upon adjoining land.
To guide Council in the determination of the application the following comments are offered:
Policy Assessment
The retrospective application meets the requirements of Local Planning Policy LPS4 6.1.11 Rural Land Uses (the Policy), with the exception of the setback as discussed above and drainage requirements. A copy of the Policy Assessment is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.5(3)
Setback Relaxation
The southern wall of the dam has an existing 4.5m setback to the Rana Road reserve. It should be noted that the dam was originally constructed at a time when Council did not have a Policy delineating dam setbacks to property boundaries.
The unapproved works undertaken have taken place on the northern face and the eastern and western walls of the dam. Both walls are setback over 80m to the front (western) and rear (eastern) property boundaries and are therefore compliant in that respect.
The sections of the eastern and western walls within 20m of the southern boundary are not compliant with the Policy, but do not extend beyond the existing 4.5m setback of the toe of the southern dam wall constructed previously adjacent to the Rana Road reserve.
The Policy states that dam construction shall complement the existing or proposed land use activities on the subject land and surrounding properties and not cause any adverse impacts to the surrounding amenity. Shire Officers have assessed the dam against this Policy statement and are satisfied that the dam:
· Has an agricultural purpose, in addition to a recreational one;
· Any drainage impacts can be addressed by the applicant, and the provision of a suitable overflow can be constructed to service the dam, to mitigate any adverse effect on adjacent properties. Conditions and advice to this effect will be included on any approval issued by Council; and
· In terms of construction, the widening of the eastern and western dam walls does not encroach beyond the existing 4.5m setback of the existing southern dam wall towards the southern property boundary.
It is also noted that location of ancillary structures such as a pump shed have not been included on the submitted plans. However, the applicants have made a separate Building Permit application for the construction of tanks and a pump shed that is considered compliant with the Scheme. In any case, Shire officers recommend a standard condition reflecting compliance with Scheme setbacks for these structures will be included on any approval granted by Council.
Dam Wall Design
It is noted that the Policy stipulates that structural certification of the dam wall is required by a practising civil engineer on properties sized less than 2 hectares only. It is noted that the dwelling on Lot 12612 is located 40m from the southern wall of the dam, and below the height of the dam wall. The landowners at Lot 12612 claim that the dam is leaking across the Rana Road reserve into their property and presents a significant threat in damaging their property, as well as their personal safety.
Drainage
The plans provided by the applicant indicate that spillways are to be constructed on the eastern and western sides of the dam walls. The detail describing how these spillways are to be constructed or directed is rudimentary, and provides little information as to how drainage from the dam is to be managed. To ensure that drainage impacts are managed on site or connected to a drainage system within the Shire’s road reserve, a condition to this extent is recommended to be included on any approval issued by Council.
Council is reminded that Shire officers are not qualified to determine whether a dam wall is safely constructed or not, or to determine whether a dam is the source of a leak. Essentially, any leakage that may be coming from the dam or spillway and affecting nearby properties is essentially a civil matter between the affected parties. The responsibility for dam maintenance, and its safe and effective operation, lies solely with the landowners at Lot 2066.
It is recommended that to ensure the importance of the structural integrity obligation of the dam and its associated drainage infrastructure is not lost on the applicant, an advice note has been included recommending the landowner engage the services of a suitably qualified engineer to ensure the integrity of the dam walls and associated spillway drainage infrastructure.
Options
Council has two options available to it in considering this matter:
1. Approve the reduced setback of the dam, as drainage impacts to adjoining properties and the stabilisation of the dam bank can be addressed conditionally;
2. Require the unapproved works made to the dam to be removed, and return the dam to its previous level of construction. Council is advised that given that the setback of the dam had been established prior to Council’s dam Policy, moving the southern dam wall setback of the dam on subject property to provide the 20m setback to the common boundary between Location 2066 and Rana Road reserve cannot be considered.
The author of this report recommends Option 1, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions to address drainage requirements and the setback of ancillary structures (i.e. pump shed).
Council may determine that the most appropriate course of action would be to require the unapproved dam works be removed and dam returned to its previous level of construction. (Option 2). This option could only be executed at considerable financial cost to the landowner, and Shire Officers are satisfied the dam presents no impact on adjacent properties provided adequate drainage infrastructure is incorporated into its design.
Conclusion
In considering this application, Council need only have regard to the reduced setback of the unapproved works rather than the overall impact of the dam. In this regard, the dam is located within a position that the reduced setback is existing will not result in a detrimental impact on the amenity of the adjacent land. Conditional approval of the application is recommended on this basis.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Planning and Development Act 2005; and Shire of Manjimup LPS No. 4.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The application has been assessed against Local Planning Policy 6.1.11 Rural Land Uses as discussed above.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
The required retrospective application fee has been paid in accordance with the 2017/18 Schedule of Fees and Charges.
Sustainability:
Environmental: The environmental impacts of this proposal are surmised by Shire Officers as being minimal on the locality, provided adequate drainage and overflow infrastructure is provided for the dam.
Economic: By creating a large water storage area this will help towards the irrigation of agricultural pursuits on the property.
Social: Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
1. In accordance with Part 8.6 and clause 5.5 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grant retrospective development approval to the application for dam extensions over Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark (Application TP 230/2017) subject to the following conditions and advice:
a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent from the Shire of Manjimup;
b) All stormwater and drainage runoff is to be retained on the subject property or be provided with stormwater drainage connections to the comprehensive district drainage system in the area at the developers cost to the satisfaction to the Shire of Manjimup;
c) All pumps and ancillary equipment and structures being setback from property boundaries in accordance with the requirements of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4; and
d) The applicant is to provide construction details of the spillway/overflow infrastructure and the method to be used to discharge any associated drainage to Kimber Road or an alternative site. Such details are to be to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup in accordance with Technical Services Policy 9.1.
2. Advises the Applicant:
a) It is recommended that the design of the dam wall is certified by a practicing civil/structural engineer to ensure that it will be structurally sound.
b) It is the responsibility of the landowner to ensure that the dam is safely constructed and maintained.
c) The landowner may be liable for any damage caused as a result of any drainage/overflow from the dam impacting on the Kimber Road or Rana Road road reserves or adjacent properties.
d) With regards to Condition c), the applicant is requested to contact the Shire’s Technical Services Department for further advice.
Moved: Jenkins, D Seconded: Eiby, W
That Council: 1. In accordance with Part 8.6 and clause 5.5 of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 grant retrospective development approval to the application for dam extensions over Lot 2066 Kimber Road, Ringbark (Application TP 230/2017) subject to the following conditions and advice: a) The development hereby approved must be carried out generally in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted with the application and these shall not be altered and/or modified without the prior knowledge and written consent from the Shire of Manjimup; b) All stormwater and drainage runoff is to be retained on the subject property or be provided with stormwater drainage connections to the comprehensive district drainage system in the area at the developers cost to the satisfaction to the Shire of Manjimup; c) All pumps and ancillary equipment and structures being setback from property boundaries in accordance with the requirements of Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4; and d) The applicant is to provide construction details of the spillway/overflow infrastructure and the method to be used to discharge any associated drainage to Kimber Road or an alternative site. Such details are to be to the satisfaction of the Shire of Manjimup in accordance with Technical Services Policy 9.1. 2. Advises the Applicant: a) It is recommended that the design of the dam wall is certified by a practicing civil/structural engineer to ensure that it will be structurally sound. b) It is the responsibility of the landowner to ensure that the dam is safely constructed and maintained. c) The landowner may be liable for any damage caused as a result of any drainage/overflow from the dam impacting on the Kimber Road or Rana Road road reserves or adjacent properties. d) With regards to Condition c), the applicant is requested to contact the Shire’s Technical Services Department for further advice. MOTION carried 7/3
|
72
9.5.7 Request for Support - Proposed Scheme Amendment over Lot 1 (No 21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex
PROPONENT |
Stellar Violets Inc. |
OWNER |
HE Giblett |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 1 (No 21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex |
WARD: |
East |
ZONE: |
Priority Agriculture |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development and Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
P55993 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005; Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4. |
AUTHOR: |
Jason Giadresco |
DATE OF REPORT: |
26/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council has received a proposal to amend its Scheme as it relates to Lot 1 (No 21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex, to facilitate various activities associated the activities of Stella Violets Inc. The land is a 3.34ha property on the northern side of Middlesex Road, near South West Highway as shown on the location plan below. Currently the property is developed with an orchard and currently contains a Dwelling, two Sheds, two train carriages and Nature Playgroup previously approved by Council.
Location Plan
The request from Stellar Violets is to initiate a Scheme Amendment to include Additional Uses over the property, and prepare a Structure Plan for the further development of the property. As defined in Shire of Manjimup local Planning Scheme No.4 (the Scheme) the Additional Uses requested over the land are:
· Exhibition Centre;
· Educational Establishment;
· Recreation – Private; and
· Camping Area
A request letter and a copy of Stellar Violets Strategic Plan 2017 - 2022 identifying the intent to amend the Scheme is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.7(1)
Although the applicants have provided clear statements of their intention to further develop the property, the applicants have not provided any plans detailing the future improvements and their location on the property. There is therefore insufficient detail to identify potential issues with the proposal. As a result this agenda item primarily deals with the process of amending the Scheme, consistency of the proposal with the Local Planning Strategy and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4 (the Scheme).
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
As provided above, the Scheme identifies the land within the ‘Priority Agriculture’ zone. It should be noted that the land has not been subject of a Scheme Amendment prior to this request.
The Scheme definitions for requested Additional Uses are as follows:
· “exhibition centre” means premises used for the display, or display and sale, of materials of an artistic, cultural or historical nature, and includes a museum or art gallery;
· “educational establishment” means premises used for the purposes of education and includes a school, tertiary institution, business college, academy or other educational centre;
· “recreation – private” or “private recreation” means the use of land for parks, gardens, playgrounds, sports arenas or other grounds for recreation which are not normally open to the public without charge; and
· “camping area” means land set aside for the erection of tents and other similar structure for temporary accommodation, and “camping” has a compatible meaning.
Consistency with Local Planning Strategy and Scheme
When considering an amendment to a Local Planning Scheme, the proposed Amendment is to be consistent with the Shire’s endorsed Local Planning Strategy. A copy of the Local Planning Strategy clause “Rural Tourism” for the Shire of Manjimup is appended to this report.
ATTACHMENT: 9.5.7(2)
The Strategy identifies the entire of Lot 1 as suitable for future low impact tourism development, such as a camping area and an exhibition centre, subject to the outcomes of an Agriculture Impact Assessment and development of a Bushfire Management Plan.
The proposed application of the Additional Uses as provided above is considered consistent with both the Local Planning Strategy and the Scheme as it briefly reflects the ability of the land to be developed for a rural tourist use. An Agriculture Impact Assessment and Bushfire Management Plan must however be completed to demonstrate compliance with the Rural Strategy.
Amendment Process
Council is being requested to initiate the Amendment. Until such time that initiation occurs the proposal remains outside of the legislative process that is dictated by the Planning and Development Act 2005 and the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015. There is also no avenue of appeal in the event that Council does not initiate an amendment.
Should Council resolve to initiate the Amendment, it needs to be mindful that once this act occurs, the Amendment is required to be processed and determined. Therefore, it is prudent that Council is satisfied that the Amendment is sufficiently justified and contains an appropriate level of detail for it to be determined by the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC). This is necessary in order to provide a high degree of confidence that the resultant development will meet the objectives of orderly and proper planning.
In this case, prior to preparing formal scheme amendment documents, the proponents are seeking Council’s support to the concept of subdividing the land into two lots. The author of this report, although supportive of the proposal, believes that further justification is required to allow Council to make an informed decision on the request for initiation of the Scheme Amendment.
Should Council support the applicant’s request, Shire employees will liaise with the landowner over the preparation of suitable scheme amendment documents. Once these documents are available, a further report will be prepared for Council to consider adoption and advertising of the amendment in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Development Act 2005.
Amendment Report
The Amendment Report and Structure Plan will need to be developed by the proponent and considered by Shire employees and Western Australian Planning Commission, in order to adequately determine the suitability of the land to be developed. This documentation will also need to address the requirements of Part 4 – ‘Structure Plans’, Part 5 – ‘Amending Local Planning Schemes’ and Part 10A Bushfire Risk Management of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
Conclusion
The proposed Amendment will provide for additional land uses over the lot and allow for it to be developed in a manner consistent with the Local Planning Strategy and Scheme, subject to an Agricultural Impact Assessment.
It is recommend that Council support the proposed Amendment, subject to the full and comprehensive preparation of Scheme Amendment and Structure Plan documentation by the proponent in accordance with the legislation described in this report. Once the full documentation has been received and assessed by Shire Officers, formal initiation of the Scheme Amendment can be then considered by Council.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Planning and Development Act 2005, Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Scheme No.4.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The Amendment is consistent with Council’s Local Planning Strategy as discussed above.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
All costs are to be borne by the proponent.
Sustainability:
Environmental: The site is clear of native vegetation.
Economic: The development has the potential of generating economic activity and providing educational opportunity in the Manjimup area. The site will act as a rural tourist attraction drawing visitors to the area.
Social: Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
1. Resolve to advise the applicant that it is prepared to consider the proposed Scheme Amendment over Lot 1 (21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex subject to the following matters being addressed:
a. preparation of a standard Scheme Amendment document and accompanying Development Guide Plan in accordance with the requirements of Planning and Development Act 2005, Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and
b. preparation of an Agriculture Impact Assessment and a Bushfire Management Plan in accordance with Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Strategy recommendations for the site.
2. Defer consideration in respect of the initiation, adoption and advertising of the Scheme Amendment referred to in point 1 above, pending a further report to Council following the receipt of amendment documentation to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer.
Moved: Tapley, D Seconded: Ventris, M
That Council: 1. Resolve to advise the applicant that it is prepared to consider the proposed Scheme Amendment over Lot 1 (21) Middlesex Road, Middlesex subject to the following matters being addressed: a. preparation of a standard Scheme Amendment document and accompanying Development Guide Plan in accordance with the requirements of Planning and Development Act 2005, Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015; and b. preparation of an Agriculture Impact Assessment and a Bushfire Management Plan in accordance with Shire of Manjimup Local Planning Strategy recommendations for the site. 2. Defer consideration in respect of the initiation, adoption and advertising of the Scheme Amendment referred to in point 1 above, pending a further report to Council following the receipt of amendment documentation to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer. CARRIED: 10/0 |
77
9.6.1 Commencement of Construction without a Building Permit - Lot 1 (No 27685) South Western Highway, Balbarrup
PROPONENT |
N/A |
OWNER |
Statewide Resources |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Lot 1 (No 27685) South Western Highway, Balbarrup |
WARD: |
North Ward |
ZONE: |
Tourist Enterprise |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development & Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
P56861 & F170472 |
LEGISLATION: |
Building Act 2011 |
AUTHOR: |
Brian Robinson |
DATE OF REPORT: |
4/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Council is requested to consider commencing legal action in respect of the unauthorised building work undertaken at the Gateway Motel at Lot 1 South Western Highway.
At its meeting held on 14 September 2017, Council granted conditional approval to an additional transportable accommodation unit, being a self-contained double bedroom unit, and two shipping containers. The structures were to be located on the eastern side (rear) of the existing development.
In late November 2017, an application for Development Approval was received seeking to vary the approved plans relating to the transportable accommodation. The modifications sought were as follows:
· Modifying the location of the transportable building to the northern edge of the existing development.
· Modify the form of the accommodation from a double bedroom to a four single bed accommodation unit; and
· The addition of a verandah to the front of the unit.
Approval was granted to the revised plans on 18 December 2017 under delegated authority on the basis that the new location complied with required setbacks, parking requirements and waste water outputs being comparable. Copies of the approved plans detailing the revisions are shown attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.6.1(1)
An application for a Building Permit was subsequently received on 22 December 2017. At the commencement of business on that day, it was brought to the attention of Shire Officers that the landowner had in fact installed the footings for the transportable on the day prior. Photographs shown the footings in place are shown at Attachment: 9.6.1(2).
ATTACHMENT: 9.6.1(2)
As a result, correspondence was forwarded to the landowner’s representative advising of the Shires intention to issue a stop work order. The correspondence furthermore requested the landowner ‘show cause’ as to why action should not be taken for the commencement of works without a Building Permit. A copy of the email response from the landowner is shown attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.6.1(3)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
Examination of Council records confirms that since September 2014, there has been a number of occasions where works have been undertaken on the site prior to the Shires Development Approval and/or Building Permit being obtained. The following is summary of those developments/situations:
22/9/2014 – Application for Development Approval for Various works including retrospective approval for 9 Accommodation Units contained within 3 Transportable Accommodation Units.
An item was prepared for Council consideration at its meeting to be held on 20 November 2014, however this application was withdrawn by the applicant who undertook, via an email dated 18 November 2014, to remove the transportable buildings from site within 30 days.
11/5/2015 – Correspondence forwarded to the landowners identifying that a single bedroom transportable and a 15m by 8m aluminium framed canvas clad marquee had been erected on site without a building permit. The transportable was subsequently removed from site, but the Marquee was retained.
26/5/2015 – Correspondence forwarded to the landowner identifying additional works undertaken without a building permit including modification of an internal storeroom into a food preparation area and the placement of a 4 bedroom transportable on site;
9/12/2015 – Application for Development Approval to a Four Bedroom Transportable.
3/2/2016 - Correspondence to the landowner highlighting that a 4 bedroom transportable had been located on site without a Building Permit.
22/12/2016 – Application for Retrospective Development Approval for the conversion of portion of the hotel to a two bedroom accommodation unit.
In each case Shire Officers have worked with the landowner to educate them on the need for approvals to be obtained and to rectify the situation and ensure retrospective approvals have been in place. With the landowner continuing to complete development prior to obtaining approvals, it appears that this approach has not been successful with the landowner continuing to undertake works without the required approvals being in place.
With respect to the latest works, the landowner was clearly aware that a Building Permit was required and consultants employed by the landowner were in the process of preparing an application. However the landowner arranged for the footings to be installed in anticipation. This resulted in the works being completed prior to a building permit even being received.
Given that the education approach does not appear to have had the desired effect, it is recommended that Council take legal action for a breach of the Building Act 2011.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
In accordance with the Building Act 2001;
9. No building work without a building permit
A person must not do building work unless —
(a) a building permit is in effect for the building work; or
(b) a building permit is not required for the building work under Part 5 or regulations or an order mentioned in Part 5 Division 1; or
(c) the work is done in accordance with a building order; or
(d) the work is done in the course of taking action under section 118(2).
Penalty:
(a) for a first offence, a fine of $50 000;
(b) for a second offence, a fine of $75 000;
(c) for a third or subsequent offence, a fine of $100 000 and imprisonment for 12 months.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
All costs associated within any legal action will be wholly contained within the adopted budget.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to commence legal action for the unauthorised installation of footings at Lot 1 (No 27685) South Western Highway, Balbarrup in contravention of Part 9 of the Building Act 2011.
Moved: Jenkins, D Seconded: Taylor, R
That Council, in this instance, issues a reprimand and advises the proponent that any further indiscretions on development related matters will result in further action being taken. MOTION carried 9/1
Reasons: · Should support local business. · This a warning. · All work was halted immediately they were advised of indiscretion. |
81
9.9.1 Request for Councillor Representation on the Southern Forest Alcohol and Other Drug Committee and Liquor Accord.
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Shire of Manjimup |
WARD: |
Whole of Shire |
ZONE: |
N.A. |
DIRECTORATE: |
Community Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F16147 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Sharon Wilkinson |
DATE OF REPORT: |
17 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Committee was established in 2012 to implement the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Project. The project represents a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Shire with St John of God Bunbury (South West Community and Drugs Services) and WA Country Health Service. Its aim is to prevent alcohol and other drug related harm across the Shire of Manjimup.
The project is guided by the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Committee which is comprised of a number of government and non-government organisations with expertise and an interest in reducing alcohol and drug related harm. Under the guidance of the Mental Health Commission (formally Drug and Alcohol Office), the Committee developed the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Plan Strategy to direct and inform the project’s activities and key performance indicators. Since inception in 2012 Council has had a representative and proxy representative on the Committee.
The Southern Forests Liquor Accord was established in 2013 as a sub-committee of the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Committee to promote safe and well managed environments in and around licensed premises in the local context. Council has one nominated representative on this Committee.
A review of appointments/reappointments of Council delegates to Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Project and the Southern Forests Liquor Accord is required to be made following the Ordinary Elections in October 2017. The purpose of this item is to correct an oversight which resulted in the appointment of Council delegates to the aforementioned committees being missed.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
In 2016 in consultation with the local community and local service providers the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Committee developed a Strategic Plan with the aim to reduce alcohol and other drug related harm in the Shire of Manjimup. The Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Project plan was adopted by Council on the 16th June 2016. The implementation of the plan is ongoing and the role of the representative committee is to guide and oversee this implementation.
Full details of the contact officers and current delegates, excluding Councillors, to the above mentioned committees are listed in the table are attached. These are committees convened by other Government and non-government bodies in our region. It is judicious for the Shire to have a representative on these committees to allow input and feedback to the Council of information that is relevant to the region.
More information on both committees can be found in the attached Terms of References.
ATTACHMENT: 9.9.1(1)
ATTACHMENT: 9.9.1(2)
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act 1995.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Local
· Shire of Manjimup Strategic Community Plan 2017-2027
Our Community; Strategy 3.6: Residents feel safe, secure and comfortable at home, work and at play.
· Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Strategic Plan 2016-2018
· Shire of Manjimup Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2015-2020
· Shire of Manjimup Youth Strategic Plan Celebrating Diversity 2015-2023
The Plan links to multiple State and National documents and strategies:
National
· National Drug Strategy 2017-2026.
State:
· The Western Australian Alcohol and Drug Interagency Strategy 2017-2021
· Strong Spirit Strong Mind - Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Framework for Western Australia 2017- 2021
Organisational risk management:
Project partners may perceive the Shire’s lack of presence on both committees as a lack of ownership and/or commitment to the project. In the longer term this may influence the project’s continuation and broader community buy-in and ultimately the success, or otherwise, of the partnership project.
The community may similarly perceive that the Shire is not concerned about alcohol and other drugs.
Financial Implications:
Nil
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Councillors represent the community and thus their input is essential to ensure the community’s voice is ‘heard’ at these meetings. Conversely, without Councillors, there is a danger of the Committee being too service provider driven.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council
1. Appoint the following Council Delegates to the Southern Forests
Alcohol and Other Drug Management Project Committee for the biennial period ending 18 October 2019 (or for such shorter term as determined by the group):
Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Project |
|
|||
Cr |
Councillor |
|
||
Cr |
Councillor (Proxy) |
|
||
Contact: Sharon Wilkinson |
Community Development Officer |
|
||
|
|
|
||
2. Appoint the following Council Delegates to the Southern Forests Liquor Accord for the biennial period ending 18 October 2019 (or for such shorter term as determined by the group):
|
Moved: Daubney, L Seconded: Eiby, W
That Council 1. Appoint the following Council Delegates to the Southern Forests Alcohol and Other Drug Management Project Committee for the biennial period ending 18 October 2019 (or for such shorter term as determined by the group):
2. Appoint the following Council Delegates to the Southern Forests Liquor Accord for the biennial period ending 18 October 2019 (or for such shorter term as determined by the group):
CARRIED: 10/0 |
85
9.12.1 Proposed Budget Amendment - North Walpole Road, Walpole
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
North Walpole Road, Walpole |
WARD: |
South Ward |
ZONE: |
Road Reserve |
DIRECTORATE: |
Works & Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160262 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995, Environmental Protection Act 1986 |
AUTHOR: |
Catherine Scollan |
DATE OF REPORT: |
23/01/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
As part of the adopted 2017/18 Budget, Council allocated $450,000 for the road re-construction of North Walpole Road. The works included upgrades drainage, vegetation clearing and road pavement sealing works. The $450,000 budget was for a section of the road starting 100m north of the South Western Highway intersection up to Straight Line Kilometre (SLK) 1.3.
The funding is provided by State Government / Main Roads Regional Road Group (RRG) $300,000 and the compulsory Shire contribution of $150,000 provided through utilisation of Roads to Recovery (R2R) funding.
Following completion of detailed design, the preliminary works undertaken to date include installation of new culverts sourcing gravel and other road construction materials and application for vegetation clearing works with Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). During this process there has been an objection by the public to DWER regarding the proposed vegetation clearing. The Shire has appealed this objection, with the Office of Appeals Convenor unable to provide a response until April/May 2018. This delay in process has rendered any further works on this project unviable for the remaining financial year.
Under the RRG funding agreement, funds that cannot be acquitted by 30 June 2018 are to be either reallocated to another project within the RRG program, carried forward to next financial year or entirely relinquished back into the RRG funding body.
The Shire requested that RRG carry forward the remaining Shire allocation for North Walpole Road to 2018/19. Main Roads WA decided to offer those funds to the RRG members for their consideration. The result of this process was RRG determined to reallocate the funds to another Shires project that was eligible under the funding agreement.
As a result of this process Council is requested to approve amendment to the 2017/18 Works Infrastructure Budget accordingly.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
N/A
COMMENT (Includes Options):
To undertake the re-construction works on North Walpole Road, some vegetation clearing works is required to enable the road to be constructed in accordance with Australian, Austroads and Main Roads WA standards while being able to provide adequate drainage. As could be expected, it is a requirement of the funding provider that roads are constructed to Main Roads WA standard.
To undertake the necessary vegetation clearing works, permission from DWER is required. The Shires appeal to the objections is based on the grounds that the amount of trees proposed to be removed had been significantly reduced and that any removal was for safety of those travelling along North Walpole Road.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act 1995, Environmental Protection Act 1986.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Regional Road Group 30 year Program, the Shires 10 year Forward Capital Works Program and Council’s Policy 9.1.14 Road Hierarchy all comment and advise the Shires road upgrade programs.
Organisational risk management:
RRG has an unfavourable view of Shires carrying forward unspent funds and regularly advises against this practice. As such, there is risk that not returning the allocated funding to RRG will jeopardise future funding for the Shire.
Financial Implications:
Given the extent of reconstruction works already approved in the RRG 30 Year Program, it is expected this project will be fully funded until completion.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Upgrading roads to Australian, Austroads and Main Roads WA standards provides safe and stable infrastructure that requires less maintenance.
Economic: Initial impact on works for North Walpole Road. However expected to be offset over time.
Social: A safe and usable road for the community.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council approve an amendment of the North Walpole Road construction 2017/18 budget.
Description |
Current Budget |
Amended Budget |
Variation |
North Walpole Road – Road Construction |
$361,936 |
$122,936 |
($239,000) |
Regional Road Group |
($1,622,592) |
($1,383,592) |
$239,000 |
Net Rate Funds |
|
|
$0 |
Moved: Winfield, C Seconded: Ventris, M
That Council approve an amendment of the North Walpole Road construction 2017/18 budget.
CARRIED: 10/0 |
88
9.13.1 Proposed Amendment to Staff Training Budget
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Shire of Manjimup |
WARD: |
NA. |
ZONE: |
NA. |
DIRECTORATE: |
Works and Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F170533 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Michael Leers |
DATE OF REPORT: |
25 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
In September 2017 the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries advertised a scholarship program titled Country Local Government Fund – Youth Development Scholarship Program 2017-2018. Existing Local Government employees aged 26 or under are eligible for the maximum grant funded $10,000 scholarship.
The Shires Works Department has an employee that meets the selection criteria and has expressed his willingness to undertake the training and study required to complete the Certificate III in Civil Construction, Plant Operations. Community Services also have an employee meeting the selection criteria that desires to complete a Diploma of Leadership and Management. The Shire has recently been informed both funding applications have been successful.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The increase in skills and knowledge resulting from training provided by a registered training organisation will aid in improving the skills base of the Shire. The training will provide a number of core and elective units related to tasks undertaken by the employees either directly and/or assisting future career development.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act 1995.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
The Shire has a management policy titled “Employee Training and Development”; this course fulfils the criteria of that policy. The Shires Workforce Development Plan also provides for industry professionals supporting our recreational facilities and activities.
Organisational risk management:
Appropriately trained and skilled employees will reduce risk to the organisation.
Financial Implications:
The estimated contribution from the Shire for the training is $2,100, which will be drawn from the Works Department’s training allocation of $29,500. There are no additional training costs for the Community Services employee.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: Nil.
Social: Nil.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council approve budget amendment expenditure of $13,660 Ex Gst as described in the table below:
Description |
Current Budget |
Amended Budget |
Variation |
Youth Development Scholarship (Civil Works) |
$0 |
($10,000) |
($10,000) |
Works & Services – Staff Training |
$29,500 |
$39,500 |
$10,000 |
Youth Development Scholarship (Diploma Leadership and Management) |
$0 |
($3,660) |
($3,660) |
MRAC |
$6,800 |
$10,460 |
$3,600 |
Net Rate Funds |
|
|
$0 |
Moved: Eiby, W Seconded: Daubney, L
That Council approve budget amendment expenditure of $13,660 Ex Gst as described in the table below:
CARRIED: 10/0 |
91
9.15.1 Minutes of the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee meeting held 17 January 2018
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Northcliffe Forest Park |
WARD: |
Coastal |
ZONE: |
N/A |
DIRECTORATE: |
Works & Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F161261 |
LEGISLATION: |
Local Government Act 1995 |
AUTHOR: |
Nicole Booth |
DATE OF REPORT: |
24 January 2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
Minutes of the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee Meeting held 17 January 2018, as attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.15.1(1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
Officer recommends minutes dated 17 January 2018 are amended to show Jim Wilson – Northcliffe Visitor Centre representative as an apology.
There were five recommendations made by the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee requiring Council approval.
Committee recommendation |
Officer’s comment |
The committee plans to nominate Paul Owens as Chairperson pending ratification of Paul’s inclusion on the committee by Council. Wendy Eiby is elected as Chairperson in the interim. |
Not supported. Recommend that Paul Owens is first approved as community representative. Pending this approval, at the next committee meeting Paul Owens can then nominate for Chair and follow normal process for election by the Committee. See below. |
Remaining $1,066 budget requirement for the Management Plan revision to be taken out of the Forest Park maintenance budget. |
Not supported even though minutes show 6/0 vote. An alternative approach is $1,066 be sourced from the 2018/2019 Northcliffe Forest Park maintenance budget, given the timing of the grant acquittal process. |
The Shire is asked to consider reimbursing the additional $1066 taken from the Forest Park maintenance budget for the Management Plan revision in the next budget deliberations. |
Not supported even though minutes show 6/0 vote. See previous comment. |
The committee recommends Council ratify Paul Owens as a member of the Forest Park Management Committee in the vacant community representative position. |
Supported |
The committee supports the conduct of ongoing Busy Bees to assist in maintenance in Northcliffe Forest Park. |
Supported |
In order to support the Committees recommendation to appoint Paul Owens as a community representative, the current Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee Terms of Reference 2017 must be amended to reflect the change. Amending the Terms of Reference requires Council approval. The amended Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee Terms of Reference 2018 reflecting the changes to committee membership are attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.15.1(2)
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act 1995
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Management Committees of Council ensure appropriate levels of community involvement in assisting the Shire manage its public open space and the relevant infrastructure assets.
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
Further reductions to the maintenance budget may impact maintenance works in Park during the 2017/18 program.
Sustainability:
Environmental: The Northcliffe Forest Park is a heavily vegetated reserve in close proximity to the town providing both social benefits and public safety concerns in respect to fire management.
Economic: Nil
Social: The Northcliffe Forest Park is an important reserve for the Northcliffe community.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
1. Receive the minutes of the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee meeting held 17 January 2018 as included in attachment: 9.15.1(1) subject to the inclusion of Jim Wilson as an apology,
2. Not support $1,066 be taken from Northcliffe Forest Park 2017/2018 maintenance budget,
3. Support the required $1,066 be taken from Northcliffe Forest Park 2018/2019 maintenance budget,
4. Appoint Paul Owens as a community representative in accordance with the updated Northcliffe Forest Park Terms of Reference 2018 attached: 9.15.1(2), and
5. Adopt the amended Terms of Reference to show Paul Owens as community representative.
Moved: Eiby, W Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council: 1. Receive the minutes of the Northcliffe Forest Park Management Committee meeting held 17 January 2018 as included in attachment: 9.15.1(1) subject to the inclusion of Jim Wilson as an apology, 2. Not support $1,066 be taken from Northcliffe Forest Park 2017/2018 maintenance budget, 3. Support the required $1,066 be taken from Northcliffe Forest Park 2018/2019 maintenance budget, 4. Appoint Paul Owens as a community representative in accordance with the updated Northcliffe Forest Park Terms of Reference 2018 attached: 9.15.1(2), and 5. Adopt the amended Terms of Reference to show Paul Owens as community representative. CARRIED: 10/0 |
94
9.16.1 Minutes of the Manjimup Timber & Heritage Park Advisory Committee Meeting held 12 December 2017
PROPONENT |
Shire of Manjimup |
OWNER |
Shire of Manjimup |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
Ward and Edwards Streets, Manjimup |
WARD: |
Central |
ZONE: |
Parks and Recreation |
DIRECTORATE: |
Community Services |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F160036 |
LEGISLATION: |
Nil |
AUTHOR: |
Gail Ipsen Cutts |
DATE OF REPORT: |
21/12/2017 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The unconfirmed Minutes of the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee meeting held on the 12 December 2017 are attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.16.1(1)
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil.
COMMENT (Includes Options):
There is one matter arising from this meeting that requires a decision of Council.
Committee Recommendation |
Officer Recommendation |
That Council appoint Jordan Piggott as the Manjimup Visitor Centre representative on the Advisory Committee |
As per Committee Recommendation |
The Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee Terms of Reference have been amended as a result of the representative changes for the Manjimup Visitor Centre. An amended Terms of Reference is attached.
ATTACHMENT: 9.16.1 (2)
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Government Act 1995
Policy / Strategic Implications:
· Manjimup SuperTown Growth plan recommendations (Timber and Heritage Park Master Plan).
· Town Centre Revitalisation Stage II
· Shire of Manjimup Strategic Community Plan 2017
Organisational risk management:
Nil.
Financial Implications:
Nil.
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil.
Economic: Nil.
Social: The preservation and interpretation of heritage is a significant contributor to social pride and the sense of place within the community.
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council
1. Receive the unconfirmed minutes of the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee meeting held 12 December 2017 as per Attachment: 9.16.1(1).
2. Note the appointment of Cr Jayde Salomone as the newly appointed Chairperson of the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee.
3. Appoint Jordan Piggott as the Manjimup Visitor Centre representative on the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee.
4. Adopt the amended Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee Terms of Reference as per Attachment: 9.16.1(2)
Moved: Bavich, D Seconded: Taylor, R
That Council 1. Receive the unconfirmed minutes of the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee meeting held 12 December 2017 as per Attachment: 9.16.1(1). 2. Note the appointment of Cr Jayde Salomone as the newly appointed Chairperson of the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee. 3. Appoint Jordan Piggott as the Manjimup Visitor Centre representative on the Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee. 4. Adopt the amended Manjimup Timber and Heritage Park Advisory Committee Terms of Reference as per Attachment: 9.16.1(2). CARRIED: 10/0 |
97
10.1 Response to questions from members taken on notice. Nil
11.2 Questions from members. Nil
11. MOTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE FOLLOWING MEETING
12. NEW BUSINESS OF AN URGENT NATURE INTRODUCED BY DECISION OF THE MEETING:
Councillor Bavich declared a Financial Interest in this Item as he has provided a property valuation quote to determine market value before and after rezoning of the property. Councillor Bavich did not speak or vote on the matter and left the Chamber at 6.47pm.
Moved: Omodei, P Seconded: Jenkins, D
That Council introduce new business of an urgent nature being Future Use of No 702 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup. CARRIED: 9/0 |
98
ATTACHMENT
L.1 Future Use of No 792 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup
PROPONENT |
R C Donaldson |
OWNER |
R C Donaldson |
LOCATION / ADDRESS: |
No 792 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup |
WARD: |
West Ward |
ZONE: |
Tourist Enterprise |
DIRECTORATE: |
Development & Regulation |
FILE REFERENCE: |
F180072 & P51955 |
LEGISLATION: |
Planning and Development Act 2005. |
AUTHOR: |
Brian Robinson |
DATE OF REPORT: |
6/02/2018 |
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: |
Nil |
Background:
The subject land is a 39.3720ha property located on the southern side of Old Vasse Road, approximately 600m west of the intersection between Old Vasse Road and Pemberton-Northcliffe Road and around 6km south, south-west of the Pemberton Townsite. A location plan is shown below.
The site, which previously formed part of the “King Trout” Tourist enterprise, is largely cleared of native vegetation. A dwelling and a number of rural outbuildings are currently established on the site. As shown on the location plan above, the site also contains a series of interconnected dams.
The owners, who are currently selling the site, are seeking to clarify the ability to utilise the site for agricultural purposes. The matter is referred to Council for determination as the issue involves the application of non-conforming use rights and potential zoning under Draft Local Planning Scheme No 5.
PUBLIC Consultation Undertaken:
Nil
COMMENT (Includes Options):
The owners are seeking to promote the potential use of the property for intensive agriculture purposes (i.e. Avocado Orchard). However provisions of the Shires Local Planning Scheme No 4 (LPS No 4) essentially prohibit agricultural activities on the site.
As a result, the only legal way that the property may be utilised for agricultural purposes under LPS No 4 is under a non-conforming use right. In accordance with non-conforming use rights conveyed by LPS No 4, where a use was legally in operation prior to the gazettal of LPS No 4 that use may continue despite not being permitted under LPS No 4. Further details regarding non-conforming use rights are provided below.
In order to assist Council in determining this matter, the following advice is offered:
Local Planning Scheme No 2
Local Planning Scheme No 2 (LPS No 2) was gazetted on 18 September 1987 and was in effect until it was the current scheme was gazetted in December 2010. Originally LPS No 2 included the subject land within the Rural Zone.
This zoning was however modified via Amendment No 89 to LPS No 2 which rezoned the land from “Rural” to “Special Development” Zone in order to facilitate further tourism orientated development on the property known as “King Trout”. Amendment No 89 was gazetted in September 2000.
An excerpt from Amendment No 89, outlining the Special Development Zone provisions relating to the land are shown at Attachment: L.1 (1).
ATTACHMENT: L.1(1)
In addition to facilitating further tourist development on the site, the provisions of the Special Development Zone restricted the potential for agricultural uses, permitting only “Aquaculture” and “Rural Use” on the property. The provisions of LPS No 2 defined these uses as follows:
“Aquaculture – means any fish farming operation (including marron farming operations) for which a fish farm license issued pursuant to the provisions of Part V of the Fisheries Act 1905 (as amended) and the Fisheries Regulations 1938 (as amended) is required.”
“Rural Use – means uses carried out in pursuit of agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, grazing, dairying or farming generally and the expression includes market gardens, stables, horse training, nurseries or the like.”
Local Planning Scheme No 4
The provisions of LPS No 4 include the land within the Tourist Enterprise Zone. The purpose of the Tourist Enterprise Zone is to “encourage the development of a wide range of tourist and recreation facilities and quality tourist accommodation and activities for visitors at appropriate locations within the rural areas and townsites of the local government area.”
As shown on Table 1 of LPS No 4 - Zoning and Development Table, uses such as “Agriculture – Extensive”, “Agriculture – Intensive”, “Animal Husbandry – Intensive” and “Aquaculture” are all “X” uses (prohibited) within the Tourist Enterprise Zone. The Scheme defines these uses as follows:
“agriculture – extensive” means premises used for the raising of stock or crops but does not include agriculture – intensive or animal husbandry – intensive;
“agriculture – intensive” means premises used for trade or commercial purposes, including outbuildings and earthworks, associated with the following:
(a) the production of grapes, vegetables, flowers, exotic or native plants, or fruit or nuts;
(b) the establishment and operation of plant or fruit nurseries, and;
(c) the development of land for irrigated fodder production or irrigated pasture (including turf farms).
“animal husbandry – intensive” means premises used for keeping, rearing or fattening of pigs, poultry (for either egg or meat production), rabbits (for either meat of fur production) and other livestock feedlots;
“aquaculture” means any fish farming operation for which a Fish Farm license issued pursuant to the provisions of Part V of the Fisheries Act, 1905 (as amended), and the Fisheries Regulations, 1938 (as amended), is required;
Given that the above uses are prohibited within the Tourist Enterprise Zone, they cannot be approved on the subject land unless the current scheme provisions are modified.
Non-Conforming Use Rights
In accordance with clause 4.21 of LPS No 4, a use that does not comply with the Scheme may continue on a property where that use or development lawfully commenced development prior to the introduction of the Scheme.
In this case, the landowner has provided information that since purchasing the property in 2004, they have continued to utilise the property for livestock (cattle then sheep) and marron. For this reason, Shire Officers are satisfied that the uses of “Agriculture – Extensive” and “Aquaculture” may continue under a non-conforming use right.
In order to support their position, the owner has provided a timeline detailing the activities that have been undertaken on the property. Through this table the owner has advised, amongst other things, that:
· In 2010 works commenced on irrigation works for Intensive Agriculture;
· In 2011 comprehensive soil analysis was undertaken and the reticulation was further developed; and
· In 2012 approximately 40 acres was deep ripped in preparation for a Lime Tree Plantation and a “Sample” fruit orchard was established including avocados;
A copy of the table is shown attached.
ATTACHMENT: L.1(2)
In the authors opinion the information does confirm that activities involving extensive agriculture (Stocking) and Aquaculture have continued since the change of zoning in 2000. That said, the information provided does not adequately demonstrate that the land was lawfully being for Agriculture – Intensive activities (i.e. Orchards).
Although it is acknowledged that the owners may have been testing the land capability for orchards by establishing a “sample fruit orchard”, the information provided confirms that there was no orchard on the property prior to Amendment No 89 under LPS No 2 in September 2000. The author of this report is therefore confident in advising that no non-conforming use right exists that would allow the landowner (or future landowners) to establish a commercial orchard on the property ‘as of right’ under the current scheme provisions.
The above said, in accordance with LPS No 4 - clause 4.22 it may be possible for the landowner to obtain approval to a change of non-conforming use right. However in order to change the non-conforming use right from one non-conforming use right to another, the landowner must make formal application for planning approval under the Scheme.
It should also be noted that where such an application is received, clause 4.22.2 states that the local government “is not to grant it planning approval unless the proposed use is less detrimental to the amenity of the locality than the existing non-conforming use and is, in the opinion of the local government, closer to the intended purpose of the zone.” Notes including in LPS No 4 indicate “The onus of proof is on the applicant demonstrating how the proposal is less detrimental”.
In addition to the above information, elected members would be aware that consultants on behalf of the Shire are in the process of finalising a new draft Local Planning Scheme. Should Council desire, there would be opportunity to modify the draft Scheme in one of the following ways:
a) Modify the provisions relating to the Tourist Enterprise Zone to permit Agriculture – Intensive uses within the zone; or
b) Modify the proposed zoning of the land to General Agriculture, reflecting the same zoning as land located on the northern side of Old Vasse Road.
There appears to be no intent to develop the subject land for Tourist Enterprise Purposes at this time. Given this, it is recommended that Council consider including the land under a General Agriculture Zone within draft Local Planning Scheme No 5.
Conclusion
The current zoning and provisions of LPS No 4 restrict the potential use of the subject for agriculture purposes. Whilst such uses are not permitted within the applicable zone, the applicant has demonstrated that the uses of “Aquaculture” and “Agriculture – Extensive” lawfully commenced prior to the introduction of LPS No 4. These two uses may therefore continue under a Non-Conforming Use Right conveyed by clause 4.21 of the Scheme.
From examination of Council files and information provided by the landowner, there is no evidence that Agriculture – Intensive uses such as a commercial orchard were either approved by the Shire, or lawfully established on the land prior to the gazettal of LPS No 4. As a result the only legal way for the landowner to establish an orchard would be to obtain approval to a change of non-conforming use right.
With respect to the long term use of the land, given that there appears to be no intention to develop tourist facilities on the land it is recommended that Council include the land within the General Agriculture Zone under draft Local Planning Scheme No 5. This will allow use of the property for the full range of agricultural purposes consistent with other land within the district.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT:
Local Planning Scheme No 4, gazetted in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Development Act 2005.
Policy / Strategic Implications:
Nil
Organisational risk management:
Nil
Financial Implications:
Nil
Sustainability:
Environmental: Nil
Economic: Nil
Social: Nil
VOTING REQUIREMENTS: SIMPLE MAJORITY
Officer Recommendation:
That Council:
1. Advise the owners of No 792 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup that:
a) it is acknowledged that the land use activities of “Aquaculture” and “Agriculture – Extensive” were lawfully established on the land prior to the introduction of Local Planning Scheme No 4 and may therefore continue as a non-conforming use right in accordance with the rights conveyed by clause 4.21 of Local Planning Scheme No 4;
b) in the opinion of Council the rights outlined within point 1(a) above do not extend to the use of the land for “Agriculture-Intensive” as such uses were neither approved or lawfully established on the land prior to the introduction of Local Planning Scheme No 4;
c) notwithstanding point 1(b) above, Council is prepared to consider approving a Change of Non-Conforming Use Right in accordance with clause 4.22 (i.e. from Agriculture – Extensive to Agriculture – Intensive) and it is recommended that the landowner liaise with the Director of Development and Regulation over the preparation and submission of such an application; and
2. on the basis that there is no intention to develop the site with Tourist Enterprise facilities, request the Chief Executive Officer to amend draft Local Planning Scheme No 5 to include the subject land within the General Agriculture Zone, ensuring that the land may be utilised for a full range of agricultural activity in the future.
Moved: Jenkins, D Seconded: Tapley, D
That Council: 1. Advise the owners of No 792 (Lot 10) Old Vasse Road, Yeagarup that: a) it is acknowledged that the land use activities of “Aquaculture” and “Agriculture – Extensive” were lawfully established on the land prior to the introduction of Local Planning Scheme No 4 and may therefore continue as a non-conforming use right in accordance with the rights conveyed by clause 4.21 of Local Planning Scheme No 4; b) in the opinion of Council the rights outlined within point 1(a) above do not extend to the use of the land for “Agriculture-Intensive” as such uses were neither approved or lawfully established on the land prior to the introduction of Local Planning Scheme No 4; c) notwithstanding point 1(b) above, Council is prepared to consider approving a Change of Non-Conforming Use Right in accordance with clause 4.22 (i.e. from Agriculture – Extensive to Agriculture – Intensive) and it is recommended that the landowner liaise with the Director of Development and Regulation over the preparation and submission of such an application; and 2. on the basis that there is no intention to develop the site with Tourist Enterprise facilities, request the Chief Executive Officer to amend draft Local Planning Scheme No 5 to include the subject land within the General Agriculture Zone, ensuring that the land may be utilised for a full range of agricultural activity in the future.
CARRIED: 9/0 |
Councillor Bavich returned to the Chamber at 6.49pm.
105
13. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE: Nil
There being no further business to discuss the Shire President thanked those in attendance and closed the meeting at 6.50pm.
SIGNED:…………………………………….DATE: …………………………
Paul Omodei
Shire President